Geologic map and database of the Roseburg 30 x 60 minute quadrangle, Douglas and Coos Counties, Oregon

Metadata also available as - [Outline] - [Parseable text] - [XML]

Frequently anticipated questions:


What does this data set describe?

Title:
Geologic map and database of the Roseburg 30 x 60 minute quadrangle, Douglas and Coos Counties, Oregon
Abstract:
This digital map database, largely compiled from new mapping by the authors, represents the general distribution of bedrock and surficial deposits of the Roseburg 30 x 60 minute quadrangle along the southeastern margin of the Oregon Coast Range and its tectonic boundary with Mesozoic terranes of the Klamath Mountains. Together with the accompanying text files as PDF (rb_geol.pdf), it provides current information on the geologic structure and stratigraphy of the area covered. The database delineates map units that are identified by general age and lithology following the stratigraphic nomenclature of the U.S. Geological Survey. The scale of the source maps is 1:24,000, but the Quaternary contacts and structural data have been much simplified for the 1:100,000-scale map and database. The spatial resolution (scale) of the database is 1:100,000 or smaller.
  1. How might this data set be cited?
    Wells, R.E., Jayko, A.S., Niem, A.R., Black, G., Wiley, T., Baldwin, E., Molenaar, K.M., Wheeler, K.L., DuRoss, C.B., and Givler, R.W., 2000, Geologic map and database of the Roseburg 30 x 60 minute quadrangle, Douglas and Coos Counties, Oregon: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 00-376, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA.

    Online Links:

  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?
    West_Bounding_Coordinate: -123.999929
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: -122.999862
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: 43.504374
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: 42.995634
  3. What does it look like?
    http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2000/0376/images/rb_sh1.gif (GIF)
    A JPEG representation of Sheet 1, the geologic map at a scale of 1:100,000 and list of map units. 107 kilobytes.
    http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2000/0376/pdf/rb_sh1.pdf (PDF)
    A PDF representation of Sheet 1, the geologic map at a scale of 1:100,000 and list of map units. 11 megabytes.
    http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2000/0376/pdf/rb_sh2.pdf (PDF)
    A PDF representation of Sheet 2, the map key, index maps, and cross-sections at a scale of 1:100,000. 238 kilobytes.
    http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2000/0376/pdf/rb_geol.pdf (PDF)
    A PDF representation of the explanatory geology and database pamphlet. 5 megabytes.
    http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2000/0376/pdf/rb_readme.pdf (PDF)
    A PDF representation of the database description or readme pamphlet. 47 kilobytes.
  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?
    Calendar_Date: 2000
    Currentness_Reference:
    publication date
  5. What is the general form of this data set?
    Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?
    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?
      This is a Vector data set. It contains the following vector data types (SDTS terminology):
      • Complete chain
      • Entity point
      • GT-polygon composed of chains
      • Point
      • Label point
    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?
      Grid_Coordinate_System_Name: Universal Transverse Mercator
      Universal_Transverse_Mercator:
      UTM_Zone_Number: 10
      Transverse_Mercator:
      Scale_Factor_at_Central_Meridian: 0.9996
      Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: -123
      Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 0.0
      False_Easting: 500000
      False_Northing: 0.0
      Planar coordinates are encoded using coordinate pair
      Abscissae (x-coordinates) are specified to the nearest 0.000128
      Ordinates (y-coordinates) are specified to the nearest 0.000128
      Planar coordinates are specified in meters
      The horizontal datum used is North American Datum of 1927.
      The ellipsoid used is Clarke 1866.
      The semi-major axis of the ellipsoid used is 6378206.4.
      The flattening of the ellipsoid used is 1/294.98.
  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?
    Entity_and_Attribute_Overview:
    Because these data were created in Arc/Info, polygons are described by tables fitting the pattern cover.pat (here and after, "cover" refers to the name of the Arc/Info coverage). These contain the general attributes AREA, PERIMETER, cover#, and cover-ID. Likewise, lines are described by tables named cover.aat, and contain topological as well as general attributes FNODE#, TNODE#, LPOLY#, RPOLY#, LENGTH, cover#, and cover-ID.
    Because these data were created using Alacarte, the feature attribute tables also include the attributes LTYPE for lines and PTYPE for points and polygons, as well as SEL, which is used internally by Alacarte to mark features that are selected, and SYMB, which is used internally by Alacarte to symbolize the features for display. Additional attributes that contain scientific information may also be present, and are described in detail here.
    Entity_and_Attribute_Detail_Citation: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2000/0376/pdf/rb_geol.pdf
    rb_geol.pat
    Geologic units
    PTYPE
    Geologic unit label
    ValueDefinition
    QfFluvial deposits (Holocene)
    QclColluvium (Holocene and Pleistocene)
    QlsLandslide deposits (Holocene and Pleistocene)
    QftFluvial terrace deposits (Pleistocene)
    QoftOlder Fluvial terrace deposits (Pleistocene)
    TdUpper dacite (late Eocene)
    TbcuTuff of Bond Creek (late Eocene) upper unit
    TbclTuff of Bond Creek (late Eocene) lower unit
    TbfBasalt of Brown Mountain (late Eocene)
    TafAndesite flows (late Eocene)
    TsfRhyolite and dacite flows (late Eocene)
    TvsVolcanolithic sandstone, conglomerate, and laharic breccia (late Eocene)
    TcColestin Formation (late Eocene?)
    TisRhyolite and dacite intrusions (late and middle Eocene)
    TibDiabase and basalt intrusions (late and middle Eocene)
    TiaAndesite dikes and sills (late and middle Eocene)
    TesSpencer Formation (late and middle Eocene)
    TebBateman Formation (late and middle Eocene)
    TebmBateman Formation mudstone (late and middle Eocene)
    TeeElkton Formation mudstone (middle Eocene)
    TtbsTyee Formation, Baughman Member (middle Eocene)
    TtbmTyee Formation, Baughman Member mudstone (middle and early Eocene)
    TthTyee Formation, Hubbard Creek Member (middle and early Eocene)
    TthsTyee Formation, Hubbard Creek Member sandstone (middle Eocene)
    TttsTyee Formation, Tyee Mountain Member (middle and early Eocene)
    TttmTyee Formation, Tyee Mountain Member mudstone (middle and early Eocene)
    TcvCamas Valley Formation (early Eocene)
    TwWhite Tail Ridge Formation, undivided (early Eocene)
    TwrcWhite Tail Ridge Formation, Rasler Creek tongue (early Eocene)
    TwcWhite Tail Ridge Formation, Coquille River Member (early Eocene)
    TwrWhite Tail Ridge Formation, Remote Member (early Eocene)
    TwrmWhite Tail Ridge Formation, Remote Member Mudstone (early Eocene)
    TwbcWhite Tail Ridge Formation, Berry Creek Member (early Eocene)
    TwstWhite Tail Ridge Formation, Unnamed siltstone member (early Eocene)
    TmTenmile Formation, undivided (early Eocene)
    TmslTenmile Formation, Slope mudstone (early Eocene)
    TmsmTenmile Formation, Turbidite sandstone and mudstone (early Eocene)
    TmssTenmile Formation, Turbidite sandstone (early Eocene)
    TmmTenmile Formation, Basin plain mudstone (early Eocene)
    TmmsTenmile Formation, Mudstone and turbidite sandstone (early Eocene)
    TmcsTenmile Formation, Submarine fan channel sandstone (early Eocene)
    TbscBushnell Rock Formation, Slater Creek Member (early Eocene)
    TbrBushnell Rock Formation, conglomerate (early Eocene)
    TbrmBushnell Rock Formation, Debris flow deposits (early Eocene)
    TrbsSiletz River Volcanics, Roseburg Member, Basaltic sandstone (early Eocene)
    TrsSiletz River Volcanics, Roseburg Member, Turbidite sandstone and mudstone (early Eocene)
    TrcSiletz River Volcanics, Roseburg Member, Conglomerate (early Eocene)
    TsrtSiletz River Volcanics, Basalt tuff (early Eocene)
    TsruSiletz River Volcanics, Subaerial basalt flows (early Eocene and late Paleocene)
    TsrSiletz River Volcanics, submarine basalt flows (early Eocene)
    TidbDiabase (early Eocene)
    KJdaDothan Formation, turbidite sandstone broken formation (early Cretaceous and late Jurassic)
    KJdmDothan Formation, mudstone matrix melange (early Cretaceous and late Jurassic)
    KJddDothan Formation, phyllitic siltstone and metagreywacke (early Cretaceous and late Jurassic)
    KJd2Dothan Formation, semischist and phyllite (early Cretaceous and late Jurassic)
    KdcMyrtle Group, Days Creek Formation (middle and early Cretaceous)
    KJrRiddle Formation (Early Cretaceous to Late Jurassic?)
    KJrcRiddle Formation conglomerate (Early Cretaceous to Late Jurassic?)
    KJmsMetasedimentary rock (early Cretaceous and late Jurassic)
    KJhfMafic silicified hornfels (Cretaceous, Jurassic, or both)
    KJagAugen gneiss (Cretaceous, Jurassic, or both)
    KJiIntrusive rocks (Cretaceous, Jurassic, or both)
    KJgdGranodiorite (Cretaceous, Jurassic, or both)
    KJhdHornblende diorite (Cretaceous, Jurassic, or both)
    KJdiDiorite (Cretaceous, Jurassic, or both)
    KJdtTectonized diorite (Cretaceous, Jurassic, or both)
    mMetamorphic complex (Jurassic or older)
    JrvRogue volcanics? (late Jurassic?)
    JriMafic intrusive unit (late Jurassic?)
    JrvsSchistose Rogue volcanics (late Jurassic)
    JrisSchistose mafic intrusive unit (late Jurassic)
    JrsSerpentinized ultramafic rock (Jurassic?)
    amp 
    bs 
    cht 
    di 
    dio 
    gs 
    gs-di 
    kn 
    ls 
    mv 
    sp 
    sp+gs 
    water 
    rg_geol.aat
    Geologically-significant linear features
    LTYPE
    Line type
    ValueDefinition
    atten. fault, certain 
    atten. fault, concealed 
    atten. fault, inferred 
    atten. fault, inferred, queried 
    contact, certain 
    contact, concealed 
    contact, concealed, queried 
    contact, inferred 
    contact, inferred, queried 
    dike 
    fault inferred 
    fault, approx. located 
    fault, certain 
    fault, certainm 
    fault, concealed 
    fault, concealed, queried 
    detachment fault, certain 
    detachment fault, inferred 
    detachment fault, inferred, queried 
    fault, inferred 
    fault, inferred, queried 
    map boundary, certain 
    normal fault, certain 
    normal fault, certainm 
    normal fault, concealed 
    normal fault, concealedm 
    normal fault, inferred 
    normal fault, inferred, queried 
    normal fault, inferred, queriedm 
    normal fault, inferredm 
    s.s. fault, l.l., certain 
    s.s. fault, r.l., certain 
    s.s. fault, r.l., concealed 
    scratch boundary, certain 
    shear zone, certain 
    thrust fault, certain 
    thrust fault, concealed 
    thrust fault, concealed, queried 
    thrust fault, inferred 
    thrust fault, inferred, queried 
    thrust fault, inferred, queried_ 
    water boundary, certain 
    rb_well.pat
    NUMB
    WELLNUMB
    LONG1
    LAT1
    WELLDEPTH
    WELLNAME
    QUAD1
    $ID
    $POLYGONID
    $SCALE
    $ANGLE
    rb_stx.pat
    PTTYPE
    ValueDefinition
    _l_lineation_i_ 
    air photo attitude 
    anticline 
    bedding 
    bedding w/tops 
    crumpled bedding 
    crumpled foliation 
    fault dip 
    fault plane 
    fault, ss, ll 
    fault, ss, rl 
    flat bedding 
    flow_2dir 
    flow_dir 
    fold axis 
    fold_axis 
    foliation 
    foliation and bedding 
    igneous foliation 
    inclined cleavage 
    joint 
    joint unmineralized 
    _l_slick_i_r_ 
    lava_tube 
    lineation 
    ot bedding 
    ot bedding w/tops 
    slick 
    small syncline 
    vert bedding 
    vert bedding w/tops 
    vert foliation 
    vert foliation and bedding 
    vert joint 
    vertical bedding 
    vertical fault plane 
    zfold 
    DIP
    STRIKE
    $ID
    $POLYGONID
    $SCALE
    $ANGLE
    rb_stx.aat
    Linear structural geologic features
    LTYPE
    Type of linear geologic feature
    ValueDefinition
    f.a., anticline, certain 
    f.a., anticline, certainm 
    f.a., anticline, concealed 
    f.a., anticline, concealed, queried 
    f.a., anticline, concealedm 
    f.a., anticline, inferred 
    f.a., anticline, inferred, queried 
    f.a., anticline, inferredm 
    f.a., anticline, plunge 
    f.a., o.t. anticline, certain 
    f.a., o.t. anticline, certainm 
    f.a., o.t. syncline, certain 
    f.a., o.t. syncline, certainm 
    f.a., o.t. syncline, inferred 
    f.a., syncline, certain 
    f.a., syncline, certainm 
    f.a., syncline, concealed 
    f.a., syncline, concealedm 
    f.a., syncline, inferred 
    f.a., syncline, inferred, queried 
    f.a., syncline, inferredm 
    f.a., syncline, plunge 
    rb_xsec.pat
    $SCALE
    $ANGLE
    rb_xsec.aat
    Lines of cross section
    LTYPE
    type of line
    ValueDefinition
    cross-section line 

Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)
    • R.E. Wells
    • A.S. Jayko
    • A.R. Niem
    • G. Black
    • T. Wiley
    • E. Baldwin
    • K.M. Molenaar
    • K.L. Wheeler
    • C.B. DuRoss
    • R.W. Givler
  2. Who also contributed to the data set?
  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?
    Wells, Ray E
    USGS-GEO-WRG-NGM
    Mail Stop 975, USGS
    345 Middlefield Road
    Menlo Park, CA
    US

    650-329-4933 (voice)
    rwells@usgs.gov

Why was the data set created?

This database and accompanying plot files depict the distribution of geologic materials and structures at a regional (1:100,000) scale. The report is intended to provide geologic information for the regional study of materials properties, earthquake shaking, landslide potential, mineral hazards, seismic velocity, and earthquake faults. In addition, the report contains new information and interpretations about the regional geologic history and framework. However, the regional scale of this report does not provide sufficient detail for site development purposes. In addition, this map does not take the place of fault-rupture hazard zones designated by the Oregon State Geologist. Similarly, the database cannot be used to identify or delineate landslides in the region.

How was the data set created?

  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?
    Wiley (1995) (source 1 of 11)
    Wiley, T. J., 1995, Reconnaissance geologic map of the Dora and Sitkum quadrangles, Coos County, Oregon: Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Geological Map Series GMS-98.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: Dora and Sitkum quadrangles
    Wiley and others (1994) (source 2 of 11)
    Wiley, T. J., Priest, G.R., and Black, G. L., 1994, Geologic map of the Mt. Gurney quadrangle, Douglas and Coos counties, Oregon: Oregon Deptartment of Geology and Mineral Industries Geologic Map Series GMS-85.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: Mt. Gurney quadrangle
    Black (1990) (source 3 of 11)
    Black, G. L., 1990, Geologic map of the Reston quadrangle, Douglas County, Oregon: Oregon Deptartment of Geology and Mineral Industries Geologic Map Series GMS-68.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: Reston and Tenmile quadrangles
    Jayko and R. E. (1999) (source 4 of 11)
    Jayko, A. S. and Wells, and E., R., 1999, Reconnaissance geologic map of the Dixonville 7.5' quadrangle, Oregon: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Contribution: Dixonville quadrangle
    Jayko (1996) lm (source 5 of 11)
    Jayko, A. S., 1996, Reconnaissance geologic map of the Lane Mountain 7.5 minute quadrangle, Oregon: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 95-20.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Contribution: Lane Mountain quadrangle
    Jayko (1996) wr (source 6 of 11)
    Jayko, A. S., 1996, Reconnaissance geologic map of the White Rock 7.5 minute quadrangle, Oregon: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Contribution: White Rock quadrangle
    Black (1994) (source 7 of 11)
    Black, G. L., 1994, Geologic map of the Kenyon Mountain quadrangle, Douglas and Coos counties, Oregon: Oregon Deptartment of Geology and Mineral Industries Geologic Map Series GMS-83.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Black (1994) (source 8 of 11)
    Black, G. L., 1994, Geologic map of the Remote quadrangle, Coos County, Oregon: Oregon Deptartment of Geology and Mineral Industries Geologic Map Series GMS-84.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: Remote quadrangle
    Black and G. R. (1993) (source 9 of 11)
    Black, G. L. and Priest, and R., G., 1993, Geologic map of the Camas Valley quadrangle, Douglas and Coos counties, Oregon: Oregon Deptartment of Geology and Mineral Industries Geologic Map Series GMS-76.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: Camas Valley quadrangle
    Jayko and M. (1997) (source 10 of 11)
    Jayko, A. S. and Gallagher, and M., 1997, Reconnaissance geologic map of the Myrtle Creek 7.5' quadrangle, Oregon: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Contribution: Myrtle Creek quadrangle
    Jayko (1997) (source 11 of 11)
    Jayko, A. S., 1997, Reconnaissance geologic map of the Dodson Butte 7.5' quadrangle, Oregon: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Contribution: Dodson Butte quadrangle
  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?
    Date: 1990 (process 1 of 3)
    Mapping of individual 7.5 minute quadrangles within the Roseburg 30 x 60 minute quadrangle was accomplished by the authors as follows:
     Golden Falls:     Molenaar, Black, Wells (1996)
     Ivers Peak:       Molenaar, Black, Wells, Wheeler (1996)
     Kelly Butte:      Baldwin, unpublished, Wells
     Tyee:             Baldwin, unpublished, Wells
     Tyee Mountain:    Wells, 1994 mapping
     Sutherlin:        Wells, 1994 mapping
     Nonpareil:        Wells, 1994 mapping
     Hinkle Creek:     Wells, 1995 mapping
     Coos Mountain:    Molenaar, Black, Wells (1996)
     Tioga:            Wells, Molenaar and Black (1996)
     Cedar Creek:      Wells, 1995 mapping
     Callahan:         Wells and Smith, 1994 mapping
     Garden Valley:    Felger, Abolins, and Wells (1992)
     Winchester:       Wells, 1992 mapping
     Oak Creek Valley: Wells, 1993 mapping
     Glide:            Wells and Niem, 1995 mapping
     Dora:             Wiley (1995)
     Sitkum:           Wiley (1995)
     Mt. Gurney:       Wiley, Priest and Black (1994)
     Reston:           Black (1990)
     Roseburg West:    Wells, 1990-1991 mapping
     Roseburg East:    Wells, 1990-1991 mapping
     Dixonville:       Jayko and Wells (1999)
     Lane Mountain:    Jayko(1996)
     Remote:           Black (1995)
     Kenyon Mountain:  Black (1994)
     Camas Valley:     Black and Priest (1993)
     Tenmile:          Black (1990)
     Winston:          Jayko (unpublished mapping)
     Myrtle Creek:     Jayko and Gallagher (1997)
     Dodson Butte:     Jayko (1997)
     White Rock:       Jayko (1996)
    
    Data sources produced in this process:
    • Wiley (1995)
    • Wiley and others (1994)
    • Black (1990)
    • Jayko and R. E. (1999)
    • Jayko (1996) lm
    • Jayko (1996) wr
    • Black (1994)
    • Black (1994)
    • Black and G. R. (1993)
    • Jayko and M. (1997)
    • Jayko (1997)
    Date: 1990 (process 2 of 3)
    The databases in this report were compiled in ARC/INFO, a commercial Geographic Information System (Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, California, with version 3.0 of the menu interface ALACARTE (Fitzgibbon and Wentworth, 1991, Fitzgibbon, 1991, Wentworth and Fitzgibbon, 1991). The files are in either GRID (ARC/INFO raster data) format or COVERAGE (ARC/ INFO vector data) format. Coverages are stored in uncompressed ARC export format (ARC/INFO version 7.x). ARC/INFO export files (files with the .e00 extension) can be converted into ARC/ INFO coverages in ARC/INFO (see below) and can be read by some other Geographic Information Systems, such as MapInfo via ArcLink and ESRI's ArcView (version 1.0 for Windows 3.1 to 3.11 is available for free from ESRI's web site: http://www.esri.com). The digital compilation was done in version 7.1.1 of ARC/INFO with version 3.0 of the menu interface ALACARTE (Fitzgibbon and Wentworth, 1991, Fitzgibbon, 1991, Wentworth and Fitzgibbon, 1991). The geologic map information was digitized from stable originals of the geologic maps at 1:24,000 scale. The author manuscripts (pen on mylar and pen on paper) were scanned using a Ideal rasterizing color scanner with a resolution of 600 and 400 dots per inch. The scanned images were vectorized and transformed from scanner coordinates to projection coordinates with digital tics placed by hand at quadrangle corners. The scanned lines were edited interactively by hand using ALACARTE, color boundaries were tagged as appropriate, and scanning artifacts visible at 1:24,000 were removed. The individual digital maps at 1:24,000 were used to create the regional 1:100, 000-scale map in ARC/INFO, and the features that were too small in area or so dense in number and location, were removed from the database to simplify the map.
    Date: 19-Sep-2000 (process 3 of 3)
    Creation of original metadata record Person who carried out this activity:
    Karen L. Wheeler
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Geologist/GIS
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Western Earth Surface Processes Team
    345 Middlefield Road, Mail Stop 975
    Menlo Park, CA
    USA

    650-329-4935 (voice)
    650-329-4936 (FAX)
    kwheeler@usgs.gov
  3. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?

How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?
  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?
  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?
  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?
  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?

How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?
Access_Constraints: none
Use_Constraints:
Uses of this digital geologic map should not violate the spatial resolution of the data. Although the digital form of the data removes the constraint imposed by the scale of a paper map, the detail and accuracy inherent in map scale are also present in the digital data. The fact that this database was edited for a scale of 1:100,000 means that higher resolution information is not present in the dataset. Plotting at scales larger than 1:100,000 will not yield greater real detail, although it may reveal fine- scale irregularities below the intended resolution of the database. Similarly, where this database is used in combination with other data of higher resolution, the resolution of the combined output will be limited by the lower resolution of these data.
  1. Who distributes the data set?[Distributor contact information not provided.]
  2. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set? USGS Open-File Report 00-376
  3. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?
    This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
  4. How can I download or order the data?
    • Availability in digital form:
      Data format: Exported coverages rb_geo, rb_well, rb_stx, and rb_xsec and supporting files in format ARCE (version 7.2.1) Size: 31
      Network links: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2000/0376/rbofr.tar.gz
    • Cost to order the data: none


Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 10-Jun-2016
Metadata author:
Peter N Schweitzer
USGS Midwest Area
Collection manager, USGS Geoscience Data Clearinghouse, http://geo-nsdi.er.usgs.gov/
Mail Stop 954
12201 Sunrise Valley Dr
Reston, VA
USA

703-648-6533 (voice)
703-648-6252 (FAX)
pschweitzer@usgs.gov
Metadata standard:
Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (FGDC-STD-001-1998)

This page is <https://geo-nsdi.er.usgs.gov/metadata/open-file/00-376/metadata.faq.html>
Generated by mp version 2.9.48 on Tue Jul 03 20:05:26 2018