Digital representation of the Montana state geologic map in ARC/INFO export format.

Metadata also available as - [Outline] - [Parseable text] - [XML]

Frequently anticipated questions:


What does this data set describe?

Title:
Digital representation of the Montana state geologic map in ARC/INFO export format.
Abstract:
This report describes the contents of a digital dataset which consists of four ARC/INFO Export format files. The dataset includes a digital representation of the Montana state geologic map.
Supplemental_Information:
It appears that the geology coverages wmtgeol and emtgeol were fitted to a standard state boundary using the rubber-sheet method while the arc coverages wmtarcs and emtarcs either were not or were fitted somewhat differently. Consequently the geographic correspondence between arcs and geologic unit boundaries is more faithful away from the map's edges, and near the state boundary arcs appear to be displaced relative to geologic unit contacts.
  1. How might this data set be cited?
    Raines, G.L., and Johnson, B.R., 1995, Digital representation of the Montana state geologic map in ARC/INFO export format.: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 95-0691.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: Files are both ARC/INFO export format (4 files) and PDF.
  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?
    West_Bounding_Coordinate: -116.05
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: -104.05
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: 49.0
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: 44.3575
  3. What does it look like?
  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?
    Calendar_Date: 1995
    Currentness_Reference:
    publication date
  5. What is the general form of this data set?
    Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: map
  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?
    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?
      This is a vector data set.
    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?
      The map projection used is Lambert Conformal Conic.
      Projection parameters:
      Standard_Parallel: 33.0
      Standard_Parallel: 45.0
      Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: -110.0
      Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 0.0
      False_Easting: 0.0
      False_Northing: 0.0
      Planar coordinates are encoded using coordinate pair
      Abscissae (x-coordinates) are specified to the nearest unknown
      Ordinates (y-coordinates) are specified to the nearest unknown
      Planar coordinates are specified in meters
  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?
    EMTARCS.AAT
    Linear geological eastern Montana (Source: OFR-95-0691)
    ARC_TYPE
    Short name for line type (Source: OFR-95-0691)
    ValueDefinition
    FLTObserved normal fault
    FLTCGeologic contact and observed normal fault
    FLTCNCLConcealed normal fault whose position is inferred
    FLTINFNormal fault whose position is inferred
    FLTINFCGeologic contact and normal fault whose position is inferred
    ICESHEETContinental ice sheet
    TERDIKETertiary dike
    LTYPE
    Line type (Source: OFR-95-0691)
    ValueDefinition
    faultLocation of fault
    otherLocation of a linear feature other than a fault
    MODIFIER
    Type of contact, fault, fold or other (Source: OFR-95-0691)
    ValueDefinition
    continental ice sheetLocation of ice sheet
    normalNormal fault
    tertiary dikesLocation of tertiary dikes
    ACCURACY
    Positional accuracy (Source: OFR-95-0691)
    ValueDefinition
    certainDefinite linear feature
    concealedConcealed linear feature
    inferredInferred linear feature
    FAULT_CONT
    Denotes that arc is both a fault and contact (Source: OFR-95-0691)
    ValueDefinition
    noEither contact or fault
    yesBoth contact and fault
    LINE_DESCRIP
    LTYPE, MODIFIER, and ACCURACE combined and one attribute (Source: OFR-95-0691)
    EMTGEOL.PAT
    Geology of eastern Montana (Source: OFR-95-0691)
    FORMATION
    Map unit symbol. This field provides a relational key to the associated table wmtgeol.tbl or emtgeol.tbl (these two tables are identical) which provides additional information about each formation. (Source: OFR-95-0691)
    ValueDefinition
    CuCambrian, undifferentiated
    DOWdry lake area
    DuDevonian, undifferentiated
    JTRJurassic and Triassic rocks, undifferentiated
    JuJurrassic, undifferentiated
    KbBearpaw shale
    KbfBelle Fourche shale
    KcColorado shale
    KcbBasal part of COdy shale
    KceCarlile shale
    KclClaggett formation
    KdgDiorite and gabbro
    KeuEagle sandstone
    KfFrontier formation
    KfhFox Hills sandstone
    KgGreenhorn formation
    KhHorsethief sandstone
    KhcHell Creek formation
    KiIdaho batholith and associated masses
    KibBorder zone of Idaho batholith and associated masses
    KjrJudith River formation
    KkKootenia formation and associated rocks
    KlLennep sandstone
    KmMontana group, undifferentiated
    KmoMowry shale
    KnNiobrara formation
    KpPierre shale
    KsmSt. Mary River formation
    KtThermopolis shale
    KtcTelegraph Creek formation
    KtmTwo Medicine formation
    KuCretaceous, undifferentiated
    KvCretaceous volcanic rocks
    KviVirgelle sandstone
    MuMississippian, undifferentiated
    OWOpen Water
    OuOrdovician, undifferentiated
    PALPaleozoic rocks, undifferentiated
    PNuPennsylvanian, undifferentiated
    PuPermian, undifferentiated
    Pu?Permian, undifferentiated, queried
    QTtTerrace deposits
    QalAlluvium
    QgGlacial
    QglGlacial lake deposits
    TKbBoulder batholith and broadly related rocks
    TKlLivingston formation
    TRuTriassic, undifferentiated
    TaArikaree formation
    TdTertiary dikes and sills
    TfFlaxville gravel
    TfuFort Union formation
    TgTertiary coarse-grained intrusive rocks
    TgaTertiary coarse-grained intrusive rocks
    TsTertiary sedimentary rocks, undifferentiated
    TvTertiary volcanic rocks
    TwWasatch formation
    TwcWillow Creek formation
    TwrWhite River formation
    pCaBelt Series - Altyn limestone
    pCapBelt Series - Appekunny argillite
    pCbBelt Series - Purcell basalt
    pCcBelt Series - Chamberlain shale
    pCdBelt Series - Diabase, metagabbro, diorite and related rocks
    pCeBelt Series - Empire shale
    pCgBelt Series - Greyson shale
    pCgaBelt Series - Grinnel argillite
    pCgrGranitic facies of Pre-Belt gneiss and schist
    pCgsPre-Belt gneiss, schist, and related rocks
    pCgs?Pre-Belt gneiss, schist, and related rocks, queried
    pChBelt Series - Helena limestone
    pCmBelt Series - Missoula group
    pCm?Belt Series - Missoula group, queried
    pCnBelt Series - Newland limestone
    pCnbBelt Series - North Boulder Group
    pCneBelt Series - Neihart quartzite
    pCpBelt Series - Pricard formation
    pCpiBelt Series - Piegan group
    pCpi?Belt Series - Piegan group, queried
    pCrBelt Series - Ravalli group
    pCr?Belt Series - Ravalli group, queried
    pCsBelt Series - Spokane shale
    pCscStillwater complex
    pCsiBelt Series - Siyeh limestone
    pCwBelt Series - Wallace formation
    pCwcBelt Series - Wallace formation
    EMTGEOL.AAT
    Linear geologic features (Source: OFR-95-0691)
    ARC_TYPE
    Short name for line type (Source: OFR-95-0691)
    ValueDefinition
    FLTCGeologic contact and observed normal fault
    CONObserved contact
    CONAPPXContact whose position is not precisely known
    CONQContact whose position is questionable
    FLTINFCGeologic contact and normal fault whose position is inferred
    POLYBRKPolygon break
    LTYPE
    Line type (Source: OFR-95-0691)
    ValueDefinition
    contactlocation of contact
    faultlocation of fault
    polybrkLocation of polygon break
    MODIFIER
    Type of contact, fault, fold or other (Source: OFR-95-0691)
    ValueDefinition
    normalNormal fault or contact
    polygon breaklocation of polygon break
    ACCURACY
    Positional accuracy (Source: OFR-95-0691)
    ValueDefinition
    N/AAccuracy not applicable
    approx. locatedPosition is not precisely known
    certainPosition is certain
    certain?Position is questionable
    inferredPosition is inferred
    FAULT_CONT
    Denotes that arc is both a fault and contact (Source: OFR-95-0691)
    ValueDefinition
    yesArc is both a location of a fault and a geologic contact
    noLocation of either fault or geologic contact
    LINE_DESCRIP
    LTYPE, MODIFIER, and ACCURACY combined as one attribute (Source: OFR-95-0691)
    EMTGEOL.PAT
    Geology of eastern Montana at specific locations (same attributes as polygon coverage EMTGEOL.PAT) (Source: OFR-95-0691)
    WMTARCS.AAT
    Linear geologic features of western Montana (same attributes as arc coverage EMTARCS.AAT with the additional attributes below) (Source: OFR-95-0691)
    ARC_TYPE
    Short name for line type (Source: OFR-95-0691)
    ValueDefinition
    DIKEPCBDike of geologic unit pCb
    DIKEPCDDike of geologic unit pCd
    DIKEPDBCDike of geologic unit pCb and also a geologic contact
    DIKEPUDike of geologic unit Pu
    DIKEPUCDike of geologic unit Pu and also a geologic contact
    FLTCNCLCConcealed fault whose position is the same as a geologic contact
    FLTTHRObserved thrust fault
    FLTTHRCObserved thrust fault whose position is the same as a geologic contact
    FLTTHRIFault thrust whose position is inferred
    FLTTHRICFault thrust whose position is inferred and has the same location as a geologic contact
    LTYPE
    Line type (Source: OFR-95-0691)
    ValueDefinition
    dikelocation of dike
    otherOther linear feature
    faultLocation of fault
    MODIFIER
    Type of contact, fault, fold or other (same attributes as EMTARCS.AAT with the additional attributes below) (Source: OFR-95-0691)
    ValueDefinition
    PuGeologic unit Pu
    pCbGeologic map unit pCb
    pCdGeologic map unit pCd
    thrustThrust fault
    ACCURACY
    Positional accuracy (same attributes as arc coverage EMTARCS.AAT) (Source: OFR-95-0691)
    LINE_DESCRIP
    LTYPE, MODIFIER, and ACCURACY combined as one attribute (Source: OFR-95-0691)
    WMTGEOL.PAT
    Geology of western Montana (Source: OFR-95-0691)
    FORMATION
    Geolgic formation (no descriptions of map units found) (Source: OFR_95-0691)
    WMTGEOL.AAT
    Linear geologic features of western Montana (same attributes as arc coverage EMTGEOL.AAT) (Source: OFR-95-0691)
    WMTGEOL.PAT
    Geology of western Montana at specific locations (same attributes as polygon coverage WMTGEOL.PAT) (Source: OFR-95-0691)
    wmtgeol.tbl or emtgeol.tbl
    This is a lookup table providing specific information about each geologic unit. The FORMATION field can be used to join this table with the polygon attribute tables of the wmtgeol and emtgeol coverages.
    FORMATION
    The map unit symbol used on the published map. This is the item that is related to the map coverage. This is not necessary a formation in the normal usage. It is a map unit. (String of width 11)
    UNIT_NAME
    The map unit name from the map explanation. (String of width 75) Formal and informal names with a minimum of abbreviation
    ROCK_TYPE
    The general rock category from the map explanation. Generally this is something like sedimentary, igneous, or metamorphic. (String of width 50)
    ValueDefinition
    (no value) 
    extrusive 
    foliated intrusive 
    intrusive 
    metamorphic 
    sediementary 
    sedimentary 
    sedimentary, carbonate facies 
    volcanic 
    volcanoclastic 
    ERA
    Geologic era from the map explanation. (String of width 24)
    ValueDefinition
    (no value) 
    Cenozoic 
    Cenozoic-Mesozoic 
    Mesozic 
    Mesozoic 
    Paleozoic 
    Precambrian 
    Precambrina 
    SYSTEM
    Geologic system from the map explanation (String of width 24)
    ValueDefinition
    (no value) 
    Cambrian 
    Cretaceous 
    Devonian 
    Jurassic 
    Jurassic-Triassic 
    Mississippian 
    Ordovician 
    Pennsylvanian 
    Permian 
    Quaternary 
    Quaternay-Tertiary 
    Tertiary 
    Tertiary-Cretaceous 
    Triassic 
    SERIES
    Geologic age information from the map explanation. (String of width 24)
    ValueDefinition
    (no value) 
    Eocene 
    Lower 
    Miocene 
    Oligocene 
    Paleocene 
    Pleistocene-Pliocene 
    Pliocene-Miocene 
    Recent 
    Upper 
    Upper-Lower 
    LITH1, LITH2, LITH3, LITH4, LITH5, LITH6, LITH7, LITH8
    Lithology from the map explanation. LITH1 is the first-described lithology, LITH2 the second, and so on to LITH8. (String of width 40) Plain text with a minimum of abbreviation
    LOCATION1, LOCATION2
    Notes on location of this particular map unit within the state. Some state maps have differing lithologic descriptions for a single geologic unit in different geographic portions of the state. (String of width 60) Plain text with a minimum of abbreviation
    COMMENTS
    Other information from the map explanation. (String of width 70) Plain text with a minimum of abbreviation
    MTCARB
    Summary field used for symbolizing derivative maps. (String of width 3)
    ValueDefinition
    0 
    H 
    L 
    M 
    MH 
    ML 
    W 
    MTK
    Summary field used for symbolizing derivative maps. (String of width 3)
    ValueDefinition
    0 
    H 
    L 
    M 
    W 
    MTBASE
    Summary field used for symbolizing derivative maps. (String of width 3)
    ValueDefinition
    0 
    H 
    L 
    M 
    MH 
    ML 
    W 
    MTFAM
    Summary field used for symbolizing derivative maps. (String of width 3)
    ValueDefinition
    0 
    1 
    2 
    3 
    4 
    5 
    6 
    7 
    8 
    9 
    W 
    MTPHOS
    Summary field used for symbolizing derivative maps. (String of width 3)
    ValueDefinition
    (no value) 
    H 
    MTSG
    Summary field used for symbolizing derivative maps. (String of width 4)
    ValueDefinition
    fg 
    fp 
    mt 
    W 
    MTBATHAB
    Summary field used for symbolizing derivative maps. (String of width 10)
    ValueDefinition
    carbonate 
    mt 
    some carb 
    LITHA
    Standardized lithologic description (some abbreviations) (String of width 20)
    ValueDefinition
    alluvium 
    calcareous 
    carbonate 
    conglomerate 
    continental sed.continental (terrigenous) sediments
    ext. intermediateextrusive intermediate
    int. alkalicintrusive alkalic
    int. felsicintrusive felsic
    int. intermediateintrusive intermediate
    int. maficintrusive mafic
    int. ultramaficintrusive ultramafic
    lake sediment 
    meta. intermediatemetamorphic intermediate
    meta. quartzitequartzite of metamorphic origin
    moraine 
    sandstone 
    shale 
    siltstone 
    Wwater
    LITH_FORM
    General geologic structure. (String of width 20)
    ValueDefinition
    batholith 
    dike 
    flow 
    gneiss 
    layered sed.layered sediments
    metased. 
    pluton 
    sill 
    unconsolidated 
    volcanoclastic 
    Wwater
    LITH_MAJOR
    Major lithology, expressed using combinations of standardized lithologic terms. (String of width 120) plain text in three forty-column sections
    LITH_MINOR
    Minor lithology, expressed using combinations of standardized lithologic terms. (String of width 200) plain text in three forty-column sections
    LITHOLOGY
    Lithology, expressed using combinations of standardized lithologic terms. (String of width 254) plain text
    AGE
    Text combined from Era, System, and Series fields. (String of width 72) composite plain text using standard names for geologic time periods
    MTLITH
    Abbreviated lithology used for symbolization. (String of width 40) composite text of lithology fields, some abbreviations

Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)
    • G.L. Raines
    • B.R. Johnson
  2. Who also contributed to the data set?
    Digital products such as this map would not exist without the geologic mapping of generations of geologists whose work contributed to the small-scale state geologic maps that have been published by most states. We gratefully acknowledge the work of the geologists and agencies that supported compilation of this map. Those agencies include the US Geological Survey and the Washington State Department of Natural Resources. We particularly wish to acknowledge Patrick Geehan, the Bureau of Land Management Project coordinator for the Interior Columbia River Basin Ecosystem Management Project, for recognizing the importance of geology to ecosystem management and for supplying funds to digitize the Washington map.
  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?
    Raines, Gary Lee
    USGS-GEO-WRG-MRS
    MacKay School Of Mines
    Reno, NV
    US

    775-784-5596 (voice)
    graines@usgs.gov

Why was the data set created?

To provide to the public a digital geologic map database of the Montana state geologic map.

How was the data set created?

  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?
    Ross and others (1955) (source 1 of 1)
    Ross, C.P, Andres, D.A., and Witkind, I.J., 1955, Geologic map of Montana.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 500000
    Source_Contribution: Preliminary geologic map of Montana
  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?
    Date: unknown (process 1 of 2)
    The map was processed digitally, as follows: the source material was scanned, the scanned image was vectorized and topologically structured, the lines and polygons were edited and proofed, attributes were added and proofed, the map was transformed from scanner units to geographic coordinate, and finally, map distortions were removed by rubber-sheeting. The initial objective was to obtain a digital representation that, when plotted, would overlay the source material within a line width; the digital version of the map meets this test.
    Date: 04-Feb-2003 (process 2 of 2)
    Creation of original metadata record Person who carried out this activity:
    Peter N Schweitzer
    U.S. Geological Survey, ER
    Geologist
    Mail Stop 954
    12201 Sunrise Valley Drive
    Reston, VA
    USA

    703-648-6533 (voice)
    703-648-6252 (FAX)
    pschweitzer@usgs.gov
  3. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?

How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?
  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?
    Eastern Montana: 133.434 meters Western Montana: 965.561 meters
  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?
  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?
    Complete
  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?
    The USGS provided basin-wide, integrated, digital inmornation about bedrock lithology, compositional classifications of lithology, potential animal habitat, stream sediment geochemistry, volcanic and earthquake hazards, and mineral resources.

How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?
Access_Constraints: none
Use_Constraints: none
  1. Who distributes the data set? (Distributor 1 of 1)
    Cindy Dean
    Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project
    112 E. Poplar Street
    Walla Walla, WA
    USA

    (509) 522-4030 (voice)
  2. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set? US Geological Survey Open-File Report 95-0691
  3. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?
    This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with US Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for desciptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government.
  4. How can I download or order the data?

Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 10-Jun-2016
Metadata author:
Peter N Schweitzer
USGS Midwest Area
Collection manager, USGS Geoscience Data Clearinghouse, http://geo-nsdi.er.usgs.gov/
Mail Stop 954
12201 Sunrise Valley Dr
Reston, VA
USA

703-648-6533 (voice)
703-648-6252 (FAX)
pschweitzer@usgs.gov
Metadata standard:
Content for Digital Geospatial Metadata (FGDC-STD-001-1998)

This page is <https://geo-nsdi.er.usgs.gov/metadata/open-file/95-691/metadata.faq.html>
Generated by mp version 2.9.48 on Tue Jul 03 20:06:37 2018