Geology of the onshore part of San Mateo County, California: A digital database

Metadata also available as - [Outline] - [Parseable text] - [XML]

Frequently anticipated questions:


What does this data set describe?

Title:
Geology of the onshore part of San Mateo County, California: A digital database
Abstract:
This digital map database, compiled from previously published and unpublished data, and new mapping by the authors, represents the general distribution of bedrock and surficial deposits in San Mateo County. Together with the accompanying text, it provides current information on the geologic stucture and stratigraphy of the area covered. The database delineates map units that are identified by general age and lithology following the stratigraphic nomenclature of the U.S. Geological Survey. The scale of the source maps limits the spatial resolution (scale) of the database to 1:62,500 or smaller.
Supplemental_Information:
Additional information is available in two textual reports: smgeo.ps is a PostScript report containing detailed unit descriptions and geological information, sources of data and cited references. The text is available in smgeo.txt. smdb.ps is a PostScript report describing the structure of the database. The text is available in smdb.txt.
ARC/INFO coverages
sm_um-py.e00
  Faults, depositional contacts, and rock units in San Mateo County
sm_um-sr.e00
  Strike and dip information and fold axes in San Mateo County
sm_quad.e00
  Index map of quadrangles in San Mateo County.
sm_um-flt.e00
  Index map of faults in San Mateo County with annotation showing the names of major faults.
sm_corr.e00
  Correlation table for the units in this map database.
sm_so.e00
  Sources of data index map for this map database.
sm_as.e00
  Index map of Assemblages in San Mateo County.  (Assemblages are described in smgeo.txt or smgeo.ps)
sm_um-dr.e00
  Drainage base map (from 1:100,000 scale original).
sm_um-cu.e00
  Cultural base map (from 1:100,000 scale original).
sm_um-topo.e00
  Topographic contours base map (from 1:100,000 scale original).
  1. How might this data set be cited?
    Brabb, E.E., Graymer, R.W., and Jones, D.L., 1998, Geology of the onshore part of San Mateo County, California: A digital database: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 98-137, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA.

    Online Links:

  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?
    West_Bounding_Coordinate: -122.554
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: -122.075
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: 37.717
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: 37.100
  3. What does it look like?
    http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1998/of98-137/smmap.jpg (JPEG)
    Image of entire map on black background
    http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1998/of98-137/smmap.pdf (PDF)
    A PDF representation of the Quaternary geologic map and base maps of San Mateo County and surrounding areas at a scale of 1:62,500 (Sheet 1). 5.5 megabytes.
    http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1998/of98-137/smexpl.pdf (PDF)
    A PDF representation of the map keys and index maps for San Mateo County (Sheet 2). 1.2 megabytes.
  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?
    Calendar_Date: 1998
    Currentness_Reference:
    Date given is publication date. Age of the rocks described in this map ranges from Jurassic through Holocene, with some occurrence of metamorphic rocks thought to be Paleozoic.
  5. What is the general form of this data set?
    Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: map
  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?
    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?
      This is a Vector data set. It contains the following vector data types (SDTS terminology):
      • Entity point
      • Complete chain
      • GT-polygon composed of chains
    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?
      Grid_Coordinate_System_Name: Universal Transverse Mercator
      Universal_Transverse_Mercator:
      UTM_Zone_Number: 10
      Transverse_Mercator:
      Scale_Factor_at_Central_Meridian: 0.9996
      Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: 123.0
      Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 0.0
      False_Easting: 500000
      False_Northing: 0
      Planar coordinates are encoded using coordinate pair
      Abscissae (x-coordinates) are specified to the nearest 50
      Ordinates (y-coordinates) are specified to the nearest 50
      Planar coordinates are specified in meters
      The horizontal datum used is NAD27.
      The ellipsoid used is Clarke 1866.
      The semi-major axis of the ellipsoid used is 6378206.
      The flattening of the ellipsoid used is 1/294.98.
  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?
    SM_AS.AAT
    Line attributes in coverage SM_AS (Index map of assemblages in San Mateo County). (Source: USGS OFR 98-137)
    LTYPE
    Line type (Source: USGS OFR 98-137)
    ValueDefinition
    contact, certainBoundary between two mapped units that was observed.
    contact, concealedBoundary between two mapped units that is concealed and its position inferred.
    contact, approx. locatedBoundary between two mapped units whose position is not precisely known.
    fault, certainStrike-slip fault that was observed.
    fault, concealedStrike-slip fault that is concealed and its position inferred.
    fault, concealed, queriedStrike-slip fault that is concealed and ... queried?
    fault, approx. locatedStrike-slip fault whose position is not precisely known.
    fault, inferredStrike-slip fault whose position is inferred.
    reverse fault, certainReverse fault that was observed.
    reverse fault, concealedReverse fault that is concealed and its position inferred.
    scratch boundaryBoundary used for printing a diagram.
    water boundaryBoundary of a body of water.
    map boundaryBoundary of the mapped area.
    SYMB
    Field used to save symbol assignments such as displayed color (Source: USGS OFR 98-137)
    ValueDefinition
    0 
    3 
    4 
    5 
    6 
    SM_CORR.AAT
    Line attributes in coverage SM_CORR (correlation table). (Source: USGS OFR 98-137)
    LTYPE
    Line type (Source: USGS OFR 98-137)
    ValueDefinition
    contact, certainBoundary between two mapped units that was observed.
    scratch boundaryBoundary used for printing a diagram
    SM_QUAD.AAT
    Line attributes in coverage SM_QUAD (Index map of quadrangles in San Mateo County). (Source: USGS OFR 98-137)
    LTYPE
    Line type (Source: USGS OFR 98-137)
    ValueDefinition
    contact, certainBoundary between two mapped units that was observed.
    SM_SO.AAT
    Line attributes in coverage SM_SO (Sources of data index map). (Source: USGS OFR 98-137)
    LTYPE
    Line type (Source: USGS OFR 98-137)
    ValueDefinition
    leaderLine drawn to associate a number with one of the smaller mapped areas, when it would be impractical to place the identifying number inside the area.
    map boundary,Boundary of the mapped area.
    SM_UM-FLT.AAT
    Line attributes in coverage SM_UM-FLT (Index map of faults in San Mateo County with annotation showing the names of major faults). (Source: USGS OFR 98-137)
    LTYPE
    Line type (Source: USGS OFR 98-137)
    ValueDefinition
    fault, certainStrike-slip fault that was observed.
    fault, concealedStrike-slip fault that is concealed and its position inferred.
    fault, concealed, queriedStrike-slip fault that is concealed and ... queried?
    fault, approx. locatedStrike-slip fault whose position is not precisely known.
    fault, inferredStrike-slip fault whose position is inferred.
    reverse fault, certainReverse fault that was observed.
    reverse fault, concealedReverse fault that is concealed and its position inferred.
    SYMB
    Field used to save symbol assignments such as displayed color (Source: USGS OFR 98-137)
    ValueDefinition
    0 
    1 
    3 
    4 
    5 
    SM_UM-PY.AAT
    Line attributes in coverage SM_UM-PY (Faults, depositional contacts, and rock units in San Mateo County). (Source: USGS OFR 98-137)
    LTYPE
    Line type (Source: USGS OFR 98-137)
    ValueDefinition
    contact, certainBoundary between two mapped units that was observed.
    contact, concealedBoundary between two mapped units that is concealed and its position inferred.
    contact, approx. locatedBoundary between two mapped units whose position is not precisely known.
    fault, certainStrike-slip fault that was observed.
    fault, concealedStrike-slip fault that is concealed and its position inferred.
    fault, concealed, queriedStrike-slip fault that is concealed and ... queried?
    fault, inferredStrike-slip fault whose position was inferred.
    fault, inferred, queriedStrike-slip fault whose position was inferred and ... queried?
    fault, approx. locatedStrike-slip fault whose position is not precisely known.
    fault, inferredStrike-slip fault whose position is inferred.
    reverse fault, certainReverse fault that was observed.
    reverse fault, concealedReverse fault that is concealed and its position inferred.
    reverse fault, approx. locatedReverse fault whose position is not known with precision.
    scratch boundaryBoundary used for printing a diagram.
    water boundaryBoundary of a body of water.
    water boundary,Boundary of a body of water. The comma at the end of the value is present in the database.
    map boundaryBoundary of the mapped area.
    map boundary,Boundary of the mapped area. The comma at the end of the value is present in the database.
    SYMB
    Field used to save symbol assignments such as displayed color (Source: USGS OFR 98-137)
    ValueDefinition
    0 
    1 
    3 
    4 
    5 
    6 
    SM_UM-SR.AAT
    Line attributes of coverage SM_UM-SR (Strike and dip information and fold axes in San Mateo County). (Source: USGS OFR 98-137)
    LTYPE
    Line type (Source: USGS OFR 98-137)
    ValueDefinition
    f.a., anticline, certainFold axis of an anticline that was observed.
    f.a., anticline, concealedFold axis of an anticline that is concealed and its position inferred.
    f.a., syncline, certainFold axis of a syncline that was observed.
    f.a., syncline, concealedFold axis of a syncline that is concealed and its position inferred.
    SM_CORR.PAT
    Point attributes for coverage SM_CORR (Correlation table for the units in this map database). (Source: USGS OFR 98-137)
    PTYPE
    Point type (Source: USGS OFR 98-137)
    ValueDefinition
    (blank)Map boundary polygon
    H2Owater body
    afArtificial fill (Historic)
    alfArtificial levee fill (Historic)
    QhascArtificial stream channels (Historic)
    QhscStream channel deposits (Holocene)
    QhbdBeach deposits (Holocene)
    QhbmBay mud (Holocene)
    QhbBasin deposits (Holocene)
    QhfpFloodplain deposits (Holocene)
    QhlNatural levee deposits (Holocene)
    QhafAlluvial fan and fluvial deposits (Holocene)
    QyfYounger (inner) alluvial fan deposits (Holocene)
    QyfoYounger (outer) alluvial fan deposits (Holocene)
    QclColluvium (Holocene)
    QsSand dune and beach deposits (Holocene)
    QalAlluvium (Holocene)
    QpafAlluvial fan and fluvial deposits (Pleistocene)
    Qpaf1Alluvial terrace deposits (Pleistocene)
    QpoafOlder alluvial fan deposits (Pleistocene)
    QofCoarse-grained older alluvial fan and stream terrace deposits (Pleistocene)
    QmtMarine terrace deposits (Pleistocene)
    QcColma Formation (Pleistocene)
    QTscSanta Clara Formation (lower Pleistocene and upper Pliocene)
    QTmMerced Formation (lower Pleistocene and upper Pliocene)
    TpPurisima Formation (Pliocene and upper Miocene)
    TptuTunitas Sandstone Member (Pliocene)
    TplLobitos Mudstone Member (Pliocene)
    TpsgSan Gregorio Sandstone Member (Pliocene)
    TppPomponio Mudstone Member (Pliocene)
    TptTahana Member (Pliocene and upper Miocene)
    TscSanta Cruz Mudstone (upper Miocene)
    TsmSanta Margarita Sandstone (upper Miocene)
    TlLadera Sandstone (upper(?) and middle Miocene)
    TmMonterey Formation (middle Miocene)
    TloLompico Sandstone (middle Miocene)
    TpmPage Mill Basalt (middle Miocene)
    TuvUnnamed Sedimentary and Volcanic Rocks (Miocene and Oligocene)
    TlsLambert Shale and San Lorenzo Formation, Undivided (lower Miocene, Oligocene, and middle and upper Eocene)
    TlaLambert Shale (Oligocene and lower Miocene)
    TmbMindego Basalt and related volcanic rocks (Miocene and/or Oligocene)
    TvqVaqueros Sandstone (lower Miocene and Oligocene)
    TslSan Lorenzo Formation (Oligocene and upper and middle Eocene)
    TsrRices Mudstone Member (Oligocene and upper Eocene)
    TstTwobar Shale Member (middle and upper Eocene)
    TbButano Sandstone (middle and lower Eocene)
    TbsShale in Butano Sandstone (lower Eocene)
    TwWhiskey Hill Formation (middle and lower Eocene)
    TwsShale in Whiskey Hill Formation (lower Eocene)
    TssUnnamed sandstone, shale, and conglomerate (Paleocene)
    KppPigeon Point Formation (Upper Cretaceous)
    KshUnnamed shale (Upper Cretaceous)
    KaAnchor Bay Conglomerate (Cretaceous)
    KsUnnamed sandstone and shale (Cretaceous?)
    KgrGranitic rocks of Montara Mountain
    KJvUnnamed volcanic rocks (Cretaceous or older)
    KJsUnnamed sandstone (Cretaceous or Jurassic)
    KJfFranciscan Complex, undivided (Cretaceous and Jurassic)
    fsSandstone
    fgGreenstone
    fcChert
    flLimestone
    fmMetamorphic rocks
    fcgConglomerate
    fsrSheared rock (melange)
    spSerpentinite (Cretaceous and/or Jurassic)
    JsvSiliceous volcanic rocks and keratophyre (Jurassic?)
    JgbGabbro (Jurassic?)
    mMarble and hornfels (Paleozoic?)
    SM_UM-PY.PAT
    Polygon attributes for coverage SM_UM-PY (Faults, depositional contacts, and rock units in San Mateo County). (Source: USGS OFR 98-137)
    PTYPE
    Polygon type (Source: USGS OFR 98-137)
    ValueDefinition
    (blank)Map boundary polygon
    H2Owater body
    afArtificial fill (Historic)
    alfArtificial levee fill (Historic)
    QhascArtificial stream channels (Historic)
    QhscStream channel deposits (Holocene)
    QhbdBeach deposits (Holocene)
    QhbmBay mud (Holocene)
    QhbBasin deposits (Holocene)
    QhfpFloodplain deposits (Holocene)
    QhlNatural levee deposits (Holocene)
    QhafAlluvial fan and fluvial deposits (Holocene)
    QyfYounger (inner) alluvial fan deposits (Holocene)
    QyfoYounger (outer) alluvial fan deposits (Holocene)
    QclColluvium (Holocene)
    QsSand dune and beach deposits (Holocene)
    QalAlluvium (Holocene)
    QpafAlluvial fan and fluvial deposits (Pleistocene)
    Qpaf1Alluvial terrace deposits (Pleistocene)
    QpoafOlder alluvial fan deposits (Pleistocene)
    QofCoarse-grained older alluvial fan and stream terrace deposits (Pleistocene)
    QmtMarine terrace deposits (Pleistocene)
    QcColma Formation (Pleistocene)
    QTscSanta Clara Formation (lower Pleistocene and upper Pliocene)
    QTmMerced Formation (lower Pleistocene and upper Pliocene)
    TpPurisima Formation (Pliocene and upper Miocene)
    TptuTunitas Sandstone Member (Pliocene)
    TplLobitos Mudstone Member (Pliocene)
    TpsgSan Gregorio Sandstone Member (Pliocene)
    TppPomponio Mudstone Member (Pliocene)
    TptTahana Member (Pliocene and upper Miocene)
    TscSanta Cruz Mudstone (upper Miocene)
    TsmSanta Margarita Sandstone (upper Miocene)
    TlLadera Sandstone (upper(?) and middle Miocene)
    TmMonterey Formation (middle Miocene)
    TloLompico Sandstone (middle Miocene)
    TpmPage Mill Basalt (middle Miocene)
    TuvUnnamed Sedimentary and Volcanic Rocks (Miocene and Oligocene)
    TlsLambert Shale and San Lorenzo Formation, Undivided (lower Miocene, Oligocene, and middle and upper Eocene)
    TlaLambert Shale (Oligocene and lower Miocene)
    TmbMindego Basalt and related volcanic rocks (Miocene and/or Oligocene)
    TvqVaqueros Sandstone (lower Miocene and Oligocene)
    TslSan Lorenzo Formation (Oligocene and upper and middle Eocene)
    TsrRices Mudstone Member (Oligocene and upper Eocene)
    TstTwobar Shale Member (middle and upper Eocene)
    TbButano Sandstone (middle and lower Eocene)
    TbsShale in Butano Sandstone (lower Eocene)
    TwWhiskey Hill Formation (middle and lower Eocene)
    TwsShale in Whiskey Hill Formation (lower Eocene)
    TssUnnamed sandstone, shale, and conglomerate (Paleocene)
    KppPigeon Point Formation (Upper Cretaceous)
    KshUnnamed shale (Upper Cretaceous)
    KaAnchor Bay Conglomerate (Cretaceous)
    KsUnnamed sandstone and shale (Cretaceous?)
    KgrGranitic rocks of Montara Mountain
    KJvUnnamed volcanic rocks (Cretaceous or older)
    KJsUnnamed sandstone (Cretaceous or Jurassic)
    KJfFranciscan Complex, undivided (Cretaceous and Jurassic)
    fsSandstone
    fgGreenstone
    fcChert
    flLimestone
    fmMetamorphic rocks
    fcgConglomerate
    fsrSheared rock (melange)
    spSerpentinite (Cretaceous and/or Jurassic)
    JsvSiliceous volcanic rocks and keratophyre (Jurassic?)
    JgbGabbro (Jurassic?)
    mMarble and hornfels (Paleozoic?)
    SM_UM-SR.PAT
    Point features in coverage SM_UM-SR (Source: USGS OFR 98-137)
    PTTYPE
    Type of point feature (Source: USGS OFR 98-137)
    ValueDefinition
    beddingA depositional surface
    flat beddingA flat depositional surface
    foliationA surface of metamorphic origin
    jointPlanar fractures
    ot beddingOverturned bedding (older rocks on top)
    vert beddingVertical bedding surface
    vert foliation and beddingVertical foliation parallel to bedding
    vert jointVertical planar fractures
    DIP
    Measured structural dip of planar features at the point (Source: USGS OFR 98-137)
    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:90
    Units:degrees
    Resolution:1
    STRIKE
    Measured structural strike of planar features at the point. (Source: USGS OFR 98-137)
    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:359
    Units:degrees
    Resolution:1
    Entity_and_Attribute_Overview:
    The databases in this report were compiled in ARC/INFO, a commercial Geographic Information System (Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, California), with version 3.0 of the menu interface ALACARTE (Fitzgibbon and Wentworth, 1991, Fitzgibbon, 1991, Wentworth and Fitzgibbon, 1991). Consequently each feature attribute table contains attributes generated by the software to describe the topology of the geographic features. In addition, the following integer fields are included by ALACARTE:
    SEL   user defined field used to save a selected set
    SYMB  user defined field used to save symbol assignments (such as color)
    
    The geologic linetypes are ALACARTE line types that correlate with the geologic line symbols in the ALACARTE line set GEOL61.LIN according to the ALACARTE lines lookup table (GEOL61.LUT).
    Entity_and_Attribute_Detail_Citation: USGS Open-File Report 98-137 file smdb.txt

Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)
    • Brabb, E.E.
    • Graymer, R.W.
    • Jones, D.L.
  2. Who also contributed to the data set?
    We are grateful to the following U.S. Geological Survey paleontologists who have examined our fossils and provided ages necessary to establish the stratigraphic sequence and structure: David Bukry (Cretaceous and Tertiary nannoplankton), Kristin McDougall (Tertiary foraminifers), Willam Sliter (deceased - Cretaceous and Eocene foraminifers), John Barron (Tertiary diatoms), Charles Powell II (Tertiary mollusks), and Bonita Murchey (Mesozoic radiolaria).
    We are also very grateful to managers and staff of Chevron, EXXON, UNOCAL, ARCO, and Shell Petroleum Companies who have provided reports, maps, picked slides, and residues for about 25,000 microfossil localities in the San Francisco Bay Region.
    We are grateful to Tracey Felger, who made the original scan and a preliminary edit of author materials; to Judy Mariant, who did additional editing and tagging of lines; and to Dominique Garnier, who digitized many of the bedding attitudes. Carl Wentworth kindly provided advice on digitizing and editing procedures. Ed Helley provided materials and advice on Quaternary units.
  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?
    USGS Western Geologic Mapping Team
    Attn: Russ Graymer
    345 Middlefield Road, MS 975
    Menlo Park, CA
    USA

    650-329-4921 (voice)
    rgraymer@usgs.gov

Why was the data set created?

This map is intended to be of general use to engineers and land-use planners. However, its small scale does not provide sufficient detail for site development purposes. In addition, this map does not take the place of fault-rupture hazard zones designated by the California State Geologist (Hart, 1988). Similarly, the database cannot be used to identify or delineate landslides in the region. For a depiction of landslide distribution, see Brabb and Pampeyan (1972), Brabb and others (1978), Mark (1992), Wieczorek and others (1985), and Wieczorek and others (1988).

How was the data set created?

  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?
    Palo Alto base map (source 1 of 37)
    U.S. Geological Survey, 1982, Topographic base map of Palo Alto, California.

    Type_of_Source_Media: scale-stable printing negatives
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 100000
    Source_Contribution: Base map layer used to compile this geologic map.
    San Francisco base map (source 2 of 37)
    U.S. Geological Survey, 1978, Topographic base map of San Francisco, California.

    Type_of_Source_Media: scale-stable printing negatives
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 100000
    Source_Contribution: Base map layer used to compile this geologic map.
    sm_um-dr (source 3 of 37)
    Brabb, E.E., Graymer, R.W., and Jones, D.L., 1998, sm_um-dr.e00: Drainage base map: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 98-137, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA.

    Online Links:

    Type_of_Source_Media: digital
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 100000
    Source_Contribution:
    Drainage base map (from 1:100,000 scale original) produced in compiling this map, supplied for reference only.
    sm_um-cu (source 4 of 37)
    Brabb, E.E., Graymer, R.W., and Jones, D.L., 1998, sm_um-cu.e00: Cultural base map: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 98-137, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA.

    Online Links:

    Type_of_Source_Media: digital
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 100000
    Source_Contribution:
    Cultural base map (from 1:100,000 scale original) produced in compiling this map, supplied for reference only.
    sm_um-topo (source 5 of 37)
    Brabb, E.E., Graymer, R.W., and Jones, D.L., 1998, sm_um-topo.e00: Topographic contours base map: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 98-137, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA.

    Online Links:

    Type_of_Source_Media: digital
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 100000
    Source_Contribution:
    Topographic contours base map (from 1:100,000 scale original) produced in compiling this map, supplied for reference only.
    Bonilla (1965) (source 6 of 37)
    Bonilla, M.G., 1965, Geologic map of the San Francisco South quadrangle, California: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 65.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 20000
    Source_Contribution: Source map for region 1 (see coverage sm_so)
    Brabb (1960) (source 7 of 37)
    Brabb, E.E., 1960, Geology of the Big Basin area, Santa Cruz Mountains, California: Stanford University, Stanford, California.

    Other_Citation_Details: Ph.D. thesis
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: Source map for region 18 (see coverage sm_so)
    Brabb (1964) (source 8 of 37)
    Brabb, E.E., 1964, Subdivision of San Lorenzo Formation (Eocene-Oligocene), west-central California: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin v. 48, no. 5.

    Other_Citation_Details: p. 670-697
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: Source map for region 18 (see coverage sm_so)
    Brabb and others (1977) (source 9 of 37)
    Brabb, E.E., Clark, J.C., and Throckmorton, C.K., 1977, Measured sections of Paleogene rocks from the California Coast Ranges: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 77-714.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Contribution: Source map for region 20 (see coverage sm_so)
    Brown (1972) (source 10 of 37)
    Brown, R.D., Jr., 1972, Active faults, probable active faults, and associated fracture zones, San Mateo County, California: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-355.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 62500
    Source_Contribution: Source map for region 10 (see coverage sm_so)
    Clark (1970) (source 11 of 37)
    Clark, J.C., 1970, Geologic map of the Davenport area, Santa Cruz County, California: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 70.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: Source map for region 20 (see coverage sm_so)
    Clark (1981) (source 12 of 37)
    Clark, J.C., 1981, Stratigraphy, Paleontology, and Geology of the Central Santa Cruz Mountains, California Coast Ranges: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1168.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: Source map for region 20 (see coverage sm_so)
    Clark and Brabb (1978) (source 13 of 37)
    Clark, J.C., and Brabb, E.E., 1978, Stratigraphic contrasts across the San Gregorio fault, Santa Cruz Mountains, West-central California: California Division of Mines and Geology Special Report 137.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Contribution: Source map for region 20 (see coverage sm_so)
    Classen (1959) (source 14 of 37)
    Classen, J.S., 1959, Geology of a portion of the Halfmoon Bay quadrangle, San Mateo County, California: Stanford University, Stanford, California.

    Other_Citation_Details: M.S. thesis
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 21000
    Source_Contribution: Source map for region 7 (see coverage sm_so)
    Cummings (1960) (source 15 of 37)
    Cummings, J.C., 1960, Geology of the Langley Hill-Waterman Gap area, Santa Cruz Mountains, California: Stanford University, Stanford, California.

    Other_Citation_Details: Ph.D. thesis
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: Source map for regions 16 and 19 (see coverage sm_so)
    Cummings and others (1962) (source 16 of 37)
    Cummings, J.C., Touring, R.M., and Brabb, E.E., 1962, Geology of the northern Santa Cruz Mountains, California: California Division of Mines and Geology Bulletin 181.

    Other_Citation_Details: p. 179-220
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 48000
    Source_Contribution: Source map for regions 14, 16, 18, and 19 (see coverage sm_so)
    Darrow (1963) (source 17 of 37)
    Darrow, R.L., 1963, Age and structural relationships of the Franciscan Formation in the Montara Mountain quadrangle, California: California Division of Mines and Geology Special Report 78.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 35000
    Source_Contribution: Source map for region 2 (see coverage sm_so)
    Dibblee (1966) (source 18 of 37)
    Dibblee, T.W., Jr., 1966, Geology of the Palo Alto quadrangle, Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties, California: California Division of Mines and Geology Map 8.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 62500
    Source_Contribution: Source map for regions 12, 15, and 16 (see coverage sm_so)
    Esser (1958) (source 19 of 37)
    Esser, R.W., 1958, The reconnaissance geology of a part of the Woodside quadrangle northeast of Skyline Boulevard, San Mateo County, California: Stanford University, Stanford, California.

    Other_Citation_Details: M.S. thesis
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: Source map for region 11 (see coverage sm_so)
    Glen (1959) (source 20 of 37)
    Glen, William, 1959, Pliocene and Lower Pleistocene of the western part of the San Francisco Peninsula: California University Publications, Geological Science v. 36, no. 2.

    Other_Citation_Details: p. 147-197
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 44000
    Source_Contribution: Source map for region 4 (see coverage sm_so)
    Hall and others (1959) (source 21 of 37)
    Hall, C.A., Jr., Jones, D.L., and Brooks, S.A., 1959, Pigeon Point Formation of Late Cretaceous age, San Mateo County, California: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin v. 43, no. 12.

    Other_Citation_Details: p. 2855-2859
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 175000
    Source_Contribution: Source map for region 17 (see coverage sm_so)
    Hall (1965a) (source 22 of 37)
    Hall, N.T., 1965, Petrology of the type Merced Group, San Francisco Peninsula, California: California University, California.

    Other_Citation_Details: M.A. thesis
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Contribution: Source map for region 1 (see coverage sm_so)
    Hall (1965b) (source 23 of 37)
    Hall, N.T., 1965, Late Cenozoic stratigraphy between Mussel Rock and Fleishhacker Zoo, San Francisco Peninsula:.

    Other_Citation_Details: p. 151-158
    This is part of the following larger work.

    Northern Great Basin and California-International Association of Quaternary Research, 1965, Guidebook for Field Conference 1, 7th Congress: Nebraska Academy of Science, Lincoln, Nebraska.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Contribution: Source map for region 1 (see coverage sm_so)
    Helley and Graymer (1997) (source 24 of 37)
    Helley, E.J., and Graymer, R.W., 1997, Quaternary geology of Alameda County, and parts of Contra Costa, Santa Clara, San Mateo, San Francisco, Stanislaus, and San Joaquin Counties, California: A digital database: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 97-97.

    Type_of_Source_Media: digital
    Source_Contribution: Source map for region 13 (see coverage sm_so)
    Jack (1969) (source 25 of 37)
    Jack, R.N., 1969, Quaternary sediments at Montara, San Mateo County, California: California University, Berkeley, California.

    Other_Citation_Details: M.A. thesis
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 10000
    Source_Contribution: Source map for region 4 (see coverage sm_so)
    Johnson and Ellen (1968) (source 26 of 37)
    Johnson, A.M., and Ellen, S.D., 1968, Preliminary evaluation of the interaction between engineering development and natural geologic processes on the Bovet property, Town of Portola Valley, California, with a section on the San Andreas fault by William R. Dickinson.

    Other_Citation_Details: Report prepared for Town of Portola Valley, California
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 2400
    Source_Contribution: Source map for region 15 (see coverage sm_so)
    Lawson (1914) (source 27 of 37)
    Lawson, A.C., 1914, Description of the San Francisco district: Tamalpais, San Francisco, Concord, San Mateo, and Hayward quadrangles: U.S. Geological Survey Geological Atlas, Folio 193.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 62500
    Source_Contribution: Source map for region 3 (see coverage sm_so)
    Mack (1959) (source 28 of 37)
    Mack, J.E., 1959, Reconnaissance geology of part of the Woodside quadrangle, San Mateo County: Stanford University, Stanford, California.

    Other_Citation_Details: M.S. thesis
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: Source map for region 11 (see coverage sm_so)
    McLaughlin (1969) (source 29 of 37)
    McLaughlin, R.J., 1969, The Franciscan series and Eocene(?) rocks west of San Jose, San Carlos and Belmont, California: San Jose State College, San Jose, California.

    Other_Citation_Details: report
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 12000
    Source_Contribution: Source map for region 5 (see coverage sm_so)
    Pampeyan (1970a) (source 30 of 37)
    Pampeyan, E.H., 1970, Geologic map of the Palo Alto 7.5-minute quadrangle, San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties, California: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 70.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 12000
    Source_Contribution: Source map for region 12 (see coverage sm_so)
    Pampeyan (1970b) (source 31 of 37)
    Pampeyan, E.H., 1970, Geologic map of the Redwood Point 7.5-minute quadrangle, San Mateo County, California: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 70-.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 12000
    Source_Contribution: Source map for region 6 (see coverage sm_so)
    Pampeyan (1993) (source 32 of 37)
    Pampeyan, E.H., 1993, Geologic map of the Palo Alto and part of the Redwood Point 7.5-minute quadrangles, San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties, California: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map I-2371.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: Source map for regions 6 and 12 (see coverage sm_so)
    Pampeyan (1994) (source 33 of 37)
    Pampeyan, E.H., 1994, Geologic map of the Montara Mountain and San Mateo 7.5-minute quadrangles, San Mateo County, California: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map I-2390.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: Source map for regions 2, 3, and 4 (see coverage sm_so)
    Schlocker and others (1965) (source 34 of 37)
    Schlocker, Julius, Pampeyan, E.H., and Bonilla, M.G., 1965, Approximate trace of the main surface rupture in the San Andreas fault zone between Pacifica and the vicinity of Saratoga, California, formed during the earthquake of April 18, 1906: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 65-.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 62500
    Source_Contribution: Source map for region 10 (see coverage sm_so)
    Thomas (1951) (source 35 of 37)
    Thomas, R.G., 1951, An example of reintrusion of serpentine: American Geophysical Union Transactions v. 32, no. 3.

    Other_Citation_Details: p. 462-465
    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 37500
    Source_Contribution: Source map for region 9 (see coverage sm_so)
    Touring (1959) (source 36 of 37)
    Touring, R.M., 1959, Structure and stratigraphy of the La Honda and San Gregorio quadrangles, San Mateo County, California: University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Contribution: Source map for region 14 (see coverage sm_so)
    Weber and Lajoie (1980) (source 37 of 37)
    Weber, G.E., and Lajoie, K.R., 1980, Map of Quaternary faulting along the San Gregorio fault zone, San Mateo and Santa Cruz Counties, California: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 80-907.

    Type_of_Source_Media: paper
    Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
    Source_Contribution: Source map for region 17 (see coverage sm_so)
  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?
    Date: 1998 (process 1 of 2)
    Base Map layers were prepared from scale-stable printing negatives of the U.S. Geological Survey Palo Alto (1982 edition) and San Francisco (1978 edition) 1:100,000 topographic map, which has a 50 meter contour interval. Scanned and vectorized images were transformed from scanner coordinates to projection coordinates with digital tics placed by hand at map corners. The images were then trimmed interactively by hand using ALACARTE to conform to the area of the geologic coverages. Small mismatches at the boundaries caused by slight differences in the original scans remain in the three base map coverages. These base map layers are digital images but no information other than location is attached to the lines. The base maps are provided for reference only. Data sources used in this process:
    • Palo Alto base map
    • San Francisco base map
    Data sources produced in this process:
    • sm_um-dr
    • sm_um-cu
    • sm_um-topo
    Date: 1914 (process 2 of 2)
    The geologic map information was digitized from stable originals of the geologic maps at 1:24,000 and 1:62,500 scale. The author manuscripts (pencil on mylar) were scanned using a Altek monochrome scanner with a resolution of 800 dots per inch. The scanned images were vectorized and transformed from scanner coordinates to projection coordinates with digital tics placed by hand at quadrangle corners. The scanned lines were edited interactively by hand using ALACARTE, color boundaries were tagged as appropriate, and scanning artifacts visible at 1:24,000 were removed.
    The source map (see lines in coverage sm_so) subdivides the mapped region into 20 numbered sections. The authors of OFR 98-137 relied on a variety of published and unpublished sources of information to compile the map. The references and comments listed here indicate which sources of information were used by the authors to map each section.
    1. Bonilla (1965). See also Hall (1965a and b).
    2. Darrow (1963), modified from Pampeyan (1994), and field checking by authors.
    3. Lawson (1914), extensively modified from Pampeyan (1994), and field checking by authors.
    4. Jack (1969). See also Glen (1959) and Pampeyan (1994).
    5. McLauglin (1969); some field checking by E.E. Brabb, 1969, and E.H. Pampeyan, 1971.
    6. Pampeyan (1970b and 1993)
    7. Unpublished geologic mapping by S.A. Brooks, K.F. Oles, and Eugene Borax, Union Oil Company of California, 1956, scale 1:24,000; some data from Classen (1959). Additional field work by T.W. Dibblee, Jr. 1947-49, and by E.E. Brabb, 1968-69.
    8. New mapping by authors.
    9. Thomas (1951) and field reconnaissance by E.E. Brabb, 1969, and E.H. Pampeyan, 1963.
    10. Schlocker and other (1965), and Brown (1972).
    11. Esser (1958), and Mack (1959), modified by field checking by E.E. Brabb, 1968-69.
    12. Pampeyan (1970a and 1993). Some data from Dibblee ( 1966).
    13. Helley and Graymer (1997).
    14. Touring (1959). See also Cummings and others (1962). Bedrock geology modified from unpublished maps, scale 1:24,000, by F.J. Noble, S.A. Brooks, Eugene Borax, K.F. Oles, R. S. Fiske, H.L. Fothergill, R.N. Hacker, and J.H. van Amringe, Union Oil Company of California, 1951-57. Additional field work by T.W. Dibblee, Jr., 1947-49 and E.E. Brabb, 1958, 1968-69.
    15. Dibblee (1966) and Johnson and Ellen (1968).
    16. Dibblee (1966). Some data from Cummings (1960) and Cummings and others (1962).
    17. Unpublished geologic mapping, scale 1:24,000 by S.A. Brooks and R.S. Fiske, Union Oil Company of California, 1956. Additional field work by T.W. Dibblee, Jr., 1947-49, J.C. Clark and E.E. Brabb, 1969-70, and T.R. Simoni, 1971. Some San Gregorio fault lines from Weber and Lajoie (1980) and Roberta Smith (written communication, 1993). See also Hall and others (1959).
    18. Brabb (1960). See also Cummings and others (1962) and Brabb (1964).
    19. Cummings (1960). See also Cummings and others (1962).
    20. Clark (1970), Clark and Brabb (1978), and Brabb, Clark, and Throckmorton (1977). More recently Clark (1981). Data sources used in this process:
    • Bonilla (1965)
    • Brabb (1960)
    • Brabb (1964)
    • Brabb and others (1977)
    • Brown (1972)
    • Clark (1970)
    • Clark (1981)
    • Clark and Brabb (1978)
    • Classen (1959)
    • Cummings (1960)
    • Cummings and others (1962)
    • Darrow (1963)
    • Dibblee (1966)
    • Esser (1958)
    • Glen (1959)
    • Hall and others (1959)
    • Hall (1965a)
    • Hall (1965b)
    • Helley and Graymer (1997)
    • Jack (1969)
    • Johnson and Ellen (1968)
    • Lawson (1914)
    • Mack (1959)
    • McLaughlin (1969)
    • Pampeyan (1970a)
    • Pampeyan (1970b)
    • Pampeyan (1993)
    • Pampeyan (1994)
    • Schlocker and others (1965)
    • Thomas (1951)
    • Touring (1959)
    • Weber and Lajoie (1980)
  3. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?

How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?
  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?
    Uses of this digital geologic map should not violate the spatial resolution of the data. Although the digital form of the data removes the constraint imposed by the scale of a paper map, the detail and accuracy inherent in map scale are also present in the digital data. The fact that this database was edited at a scale of 1:24,000 means that higher resolution information is not present in the dataset. Plotting at scales larger than 1:24,000 will not yield greater real detail, although it may reveal fine-scale irregularities below the intended resolution of the database. Similarly, where this database is used in combination with other data of higher resolution, the resolution of the combined output will be limited by the lower resolution of these data. Note that in contrast to the geologic coverages, the base map layers have a resolution of 1:100,000, so significant discrepancies with the geologic coverages are possible. The base map layers are provided for reference only.
  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?
  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?
    The mapped area includes parts of the Pacific Ocean, San Francisco Bay, and several large lakes; these areas are identified as water bodies and the geologic units underlying them are not indicated in this report.
  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?
    The map is compiled from 20 different sources, including direct observations by the authors. One of the included coverages (SM_SO.E00) indicates the geographic area covered by each of the source maps. Citations for published sources are given in the lineage, and unpublished sources and original mapping are described in the appropriate process step.

How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?
Access_Constraints: None
Use_Constraints: None
  1. Who distributes the data set? (Distributor 1 of 1)
    San Mateo County Geologic Database
    Database coordinator
    345 Middlefield Road, MS 975
    Menlo Park, CA
    USA

    650-329-4921 (voice)
    rgraymer@usgs.gov
  2. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set? USGS Open-File Report 98-137
  3. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?
    This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
    This database, identified as "Geology of San Mateo County, California: A digital database," has been approved for release and publication by the Director of the USGS. Although this database has been subjected to rigorous review and is substantially complete, the USGS reserves the right to revise the data pursuant to further analysis and review. Furthermore, it is released on condition that neither the USGS nor the United States Government may be held liable for any damages resulting from its authorized or unauthorized use.
  4. How can I download or order the data?
    • Availability in digital form:
      Data format:
      ARC/INFO coverages
      sm_um-py.e00      Faults, depositional contacts, and rock units
      sm_um-sr.e00      Strike and dip information and fold axes
      sm_quad.e00       Index map of quadrangles
      sm_um-flt.e00     Index map of faults
      sm_corr.e00       Correlation table for the units
      sm_so.e00         Sources of data index map
      sm_as.e00         Index map of Assemblages
      sm_um-dr.e00      Drainage base map
      sm_um-cu.e00      Cultural base map
      sm_um-topo.e00    Topographic contours base map
      
      in format ARCE (version 7.0.4) Size: 5.4
      Network links: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1998/of98-137/sm_g1.tar.gz
    • Cost to order the data: none


Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 05-Feb-2016
Metadata author:
Peter N. Schweitzer
U.S. Geological Survey
Collection manager, USGS Geoscience Data Clearinghouse, http://geo-nsdi.er.usgs.gov/
12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Mail Stop 918
Reston, VA
USA

703-648-6533 (voice)
703-648-6560 (FAX)
pschweitzer@usgs.gov
Metadata standard:
Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (FGDC-STD-001-1998)
Metadata extensions used:

This page is <https://geo-nsdi.er.usgs.gov/metadata/open-file/98-137/metadata.faq.html>
Generated by mp version 2.9.48 on Tue Jul 03 20:07:08 2018