Geologic Map and Digital Database of the Cougar Buttes 7.5' Quadrangle, San Bernardino County, California

Metadata also available as - [Outline] - [Parseable text] - [XML]

Frequently anticipated questions:


What does this data set describe?

Title:
Geologic Map and Digital Database of the Cougar Buttes 7.5' Quadrangle, San Bernardino County, California
Abstract:
This data set maps and describes the geology of the Cougar Buttes 7.5' quadrangle, San Bernardino County, California. Created using Environmental Systems Research Institute's ARC/INFO software, the data base consists of the following items: (1) a map coverage showing geologic contacts and units, (2) a separate coverage layer showing structural data, (3) a scanned topographic base at a scale of 1:24,000, and (4) attribute tables for geologic units (polygons), contacts (arcs), and site-specific data (points). The data base is accompanied by a readme file and this metadata file. In addition, the data set includes the following graphic and text products: (1) A portable document file (.pdf) containing a browse-graphic of the geologic map on a 1:24,000 topographic base. The map is accompanied by a marginal explanation consisting of a Description of Map Units (DMU), a Correlation of Map Units (CMU), and a key to point and line symbols. (2) Separate .pdf files of the DMU and CMU, individually. (3) A PostScript graphic plot-file containing the geologic map on a 1:24,000 topographic base accompanied by the marginal explanation. (4) A pamphlet that summarizes the late Cenozoic geology of the Cougar Buttes quadrangle.
The geologic map data base contains original U.S. Geological Survey data generated by detailed field observation and by interpretation of aerial photographs, including low-altitude color and black-and-white photographs and high-altitude infrared photographs. The map was created by transferring lines from the aerial photographs to a 1:24,000 topographic base via a mylar orthophoto-quadrangle or by using a PG-2 plotter. The map was then scribed, scanned, and imported into ARC/INFO, where the database was built. Within the database, geologic contacts are represented as lines (arcs), geologic units as polygons, and site-specific data as points. Polygon, arc, and point attribute tables (.pat, .aat, and .pat, respectively) uniquely identify each geologic datum and link it to other tables (.rel) that provide more detailed geologic information.
  1. How might this data set be cited?
    Powell, Robert E., Matti, Jonathan C., and Pamela M. Cossette (digital compiler), 2000301, Geologic Map and Digital Database of the Cougar Buttes 7.5' Quadrangle, San Bernardino County, California: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 00-175, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California.

    Online Links:

  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?
    West_Bounding_Coordinate: -116.87509313
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: -116.74990687
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: 34.49999995
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: 34.37498407
  3. What does it look like?
    http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2000/0175/images/coug.jpg (jpg)
    The browse graphic file contains a navigable image of the geologic map, topographic base, Correlation of Map Units, Description of Map Units and key to point and line symbols.
  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?
    Calendar_Date: 2000
    Currentness_Reference:
    New data
  5. What is the general form of this data set?
    Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?
    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?
      This is a Vector data set. It contains the following vector data types (SDTS terminology):
      • Point (2503)
      • String (6070)
      • GT-polygon composed of chains (2504)
    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?
      The map projection used is Polyconic.
      Projection parameters:
      Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: -116.8125
      Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 34.375
      False_Easting: 0.00000
      False_Northing: 0.00000
      Planar coordinates are encoded using coordinate pair
      Abscissae (x-coordinates) are specified to the nearest 0.0000001
      Ordinates (y-coordinates) are specified to the nearest 0.0000001
      Planar coordinates are specified in Meters
      The horizontal datum used is North American Datum of 1927.
      The ellipsoid used is Clarke 1866.
      The semi-major axis of the ellipsoid used is 6378206.4.
      The flattening of the ellipsoid used is 1/294.98.
  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?
    Entity_and_Attribute_Overview:
    The ARC/INFO version of the Digital Geologic Map of the Cougar Buttes 7.5'quadrangle consists of five coverages:
    1) coug_geo - geology
    Geologic units are delineated by geologic line entities and described by polygons which are attributed with the following set of attribute items in coug_geo.pat. For display purposes, the geology coverage contains three annotation subclasses: anno.geo contains unit labels, anno.fault contains formal fault names, and anno.twn_rnge contains township and range data.
    
    COUG_GEO.PAT:
    
    COLUMN   ITEM NAME        WIDTH OUTPUT  TYPE N.DEC  ALTERNATE NAME
        1  AREA                   8    18     F      5
        9  PERIMETER              8    18     F      5
       17  COUG_GEO#          4     5     B      -
       21  COUG_GEO-ID        4     5     B      -
       25  LABL                  35    35     C      -
       60  PLABL                 35    35     C      -
       95  TAG                   25    25     C      -
      120  SHDPS                  3     3     I      -
      123  NAME                 254   254     C      -
      377  SHDFIL                 3     3     I      -
    
    
    LABL geologic map unit label, in plain text
    Alphabetized list of map units symbols (LABL) and the corresponding map unit names (NAME) specified in the Cougar Buttes geologic map database (coug_geo.pat):
    
    Jg		Granite
    Jp		Porphyritic quartz monzonite, monzogranite,
    			and granodiorite
    Kcb		Monzogranite of Cougar Buttes
    Kgd		Granodiorite
    Kmi		Mafic-rich intermediate rocks
    Kmp		Mixed plutonic rocks
    Kp		Porphyritic monzogranite
    MzPrgg		Granitic orthogneiss
    Prgn		Gneiss
    QTbrbc		Breccia, strata of Blackhawk Canyon
    QTbrc 		Breccia, carbonate rocks
    QTbrg		Breccia, granitic rocks
    QTc		Conglomerate of Cushenbury Spring
    QTs1		Sandstone and conglomerate, member 1
    QTs2		Sandstone and conglomerate, member 2
    QTspcb 		Saprolite, monzogranite of Cougar Buttes
    QTspmp 		Saprolite, mixed plutonic rocks
    Qmof		Moderately old alluvial fan deposits
    Qmof? 		Moderately old alluvial fan deposits?
    Qmol		Moderately old lacustrine deposits
    Qmol? 		Moderately old lacustrine deposits?
    Qmolsbc		Moderately old landslide breccia,
    			strata of Blackhawk Canyon
    Qmolsc		Moderately old landslide breccia,
    		carbonate rocks
    Qmolscc		Moderately old landslide breccia,
    			conglomerate of Cushenbury Springs
    Qmos		Moderately old slope wash and alluvial
    			deposits
    Qoc		Old colluvial deposits
    Qoc?		Old colluvial deposits?
    Qoc1		Old colluvial deposits, unit 1
    Qoc2		Old colluvial deposits, unit 2
    Qof		Old alluvial fan deposits
    Qof? 		Old alluvial fan deposits?
    Qolsbc		Old landslide breccia, strata of Blackhawk
    		Canyon
    Qolsc		Old landslide breccia, carbonate-rock
    Qolsg		Old landslide breccia, granitic rocks
    Qp		Active playa deposits
    Qvodf		Very old debris flow fan deposits
    Qvof1		Very old alluvial fan deposits, unit 1
    Qvof2		Very old alluvial fan deposits, unit 2
    Qvos		Very old slope wash and alluvial deposits
    Qvos? 		Very old slope wash and alluvial deposits?
    Qw		Active wash deposits
    Qya		Young axial valley deposits
    Qyas+Qye	Young alluvial and slope wash deposits +
    		Quaternary young eolian deposits
    Qydf		Young debris flow fan deposits
    Qye		Young eolian deposits
    Qye? 		Young eolian deposits?
    Qyf		Young alluvial fan deposits
    Qyf1		Young alluvial fan deposits, unit 1
    Qyf2		Young alluvial fan deposits, unit 2
    Qyf3		Young alluvial fan deposits, unit 3
    Qyf4		Young alluvial fan deposits, unit 4
    Qyfe		Young alluvial fan and eolian deposits
    Qyfe? 		Young alluvial fan and eolian deposits?
    Qyfs 		Young alluvial fan sand deposits
    Qyfw1		Young alluvial fan feeder wash deposits,
    			unit 1
    Qyfw2		Young alluvial fan feeder wash deposits,
    			unit 2
    Qyfw3		Young alluvial fan feeder wash deposits,
    			unit 3
    Qyfw4		Young alluvial fan feeder wash deposits,
    			unit 4
    Qyls		Young landslide deposits
    Qyos 		Young(?) and old slope wash and alluvial deposits
    Qyoss1		Young(?) and old slope wash and alluvial deposits,
    			substrate 1
    Qyoss2		Young(?) and old slope wash and alluvial deposits,
    			substrate 2
    Qyoce		Young and old colluvial and eolian deposits
    Qyp		Young playa deposits
    Qyse		Young slope wash, alluvial, and eolian deposits
    Qyse? 		Young slope wash, alluvial, and eolian deposits?
    Qysos1		Young slope wash and alluvial deposits,
    			oxidized, substrate 1
    Qysos2		Young slope wash and alluvial deposits,
    			oxidized, substrate 2
    Qysos2? 		Young slope wash and alluvial deposits,
    			oxidized, substrate 2?
    Qysos3		Young slope wash and alluvial deposits,
    			oxidized, substrate 3
    Qysos3? 		Young slope wash and alluvial deposits,
    			oxidized, substrate 3?
    Qyss		Young slope wash and alluvial deposits,
    			sandstone substrate
    Qysws1		Young slope wash and alluvial deposits,
    			white, substrate 1
    Qysws2		Young slope wash and alluvial deposits,
    			white, substrate 2
    Qyw		Young wash deposits
    Ta		Arkosic sandstone
    Ta? 		Arkosic sandstone?
    Tb		Basalt
    Tl		Lacustrine strata
    Tl? 		Lacustrine strata?
    
    PLABL coded geologic map unit label used to generate plot labels with relevant stratigraphic symbols. The geologic units with LABL MzPrgg (Mesozoic or Proterozoic) and Prgn (Proterozoic) appear as }<gg, <gn respectively in the item PLABL. The replacement characters call their corresponding symbols from the Stratagem Font Group. Geologic map unit labels will plot on derivative map plots with appropriate stratigraphic symbols if PLABL is used as the source of unit labels. The Stratagem Font Group is accessed through geofont.txt, and is included in the data package.
    TAG enables identification of polygons, within a unit, of which the geology is sufficiently distinct from that of the overall unit. The default designation is the unit label with the suffix A. Polygons representing unique properties other than the default can be identified with suffixes B, C...etc. All polygons in the Cougar Buttes quadrangle are designated by the suffix A.
    SHDPS polygon color from shadeset scamp2.shd (included in the data package)
    NAME geologic name of each unit
    SHDFIL polygon fill pattern from shadeset geology2.shd (included in the data package)
    Geologic lines, which include features such as faults, contacts, and marker horizons are attributed with the following set of feature attribute items contained in coug_geo.aat. (A complete description of each line type is available in the data table, lines.rel.)
    
    COUG_GEO.AAT:
    
    COLUMN   ITEM NAME        WIDTH OUTPUT  TYPE N.DEC  ALTERNATE NAME
        1  FNODE#                 4     5     B      -
        5  TNODE#                 4     5     B      -
        9  LPOLY#                 4     5     B      -
       13  RPOLY#                 4     5     B      -
       17  LENGTH                 8    18     F      5
       25  COUG_GEO#          4     5     B      -
       29  COUG_GEO-ID        4     5     B      -
       33  L-TAG                 25    25     C      -
       58  L-SYMB                 3     3     I      -
       61  L-NAME               200   200     C      -
    
    
    
    L-TAG line tag which consists of a character and numerical value, e.g. C17, allows the user to relate the line entity to its corresponding definition in lines.rel
    List of line types used in the Cougar Buttes geologic map coverage (coug _geo.aat), including abbreviated descriptions from lines.rel:
    C17	Contact, landslide, location meets map accuracy standard
    C18	Contact, landslide, location may not meet map accuracy
    	standard
    C2	Contact, generic, location may not meet map accuracy
    	standard
    C22	Contact, landslide, questionable, location may not meet map
    	accuracy standard
    C23	Contact, landslide, questionable, covered, location may not
    	meet map accuracy standard
    C30	Contact, sedimentary, location may not meet map accuracy
    	standard
    C31	Contact, sedimentary, inferred, location may not meet map
    	accuracy standard
    C32	Contact, sedimentary, covered, location may not meet map
    	accuracy standard
    C42	Contact, sedimentary, gradational, location may not meet
    	map accuracy standard
    C49	Contact, igneous, location meets map accuracy standard
    C50	Contact, igneous, location may not meet map accuracy
    	standard
    C65	Contact, metamorphic, location meets map accuracy standard
    C66	Contact, metamorphic, location may not meet map accuracy
    	standard
    C81	Contact, regolith, location meets map accuracy standard
    C82	Contact, regolith, location may not meet map accuracy
    	standard
    CL1	Cartographic line, map boundary
    F14	Fault, high angle, strike slip, right lateral, inferred,
    	location may not meet map accuracy standard
    F16	Fault, high angle, normal slip, location may not meet map
    	accuracy standard
    F20	Fault, high angle, strike slip, right lateral, covered,
    	location may not meet map accuracy standard
    F22	Fault, high angle, normal slip, covered, location may not
    	meet map accuracy standard
    F31	Fault, high angle, slip unspecified, generic, inferred,
    	location may not meet map accuracy standard
    F38	Fault, high angle, strike slip, right lateral,
    	questionable, location may not meet map accuracy standard
    F8	Fault, high angle, strike slip, right lateral, location
    	may not meet map accuracy standard
    F90	Fault, low angle, slip unspecified, older over younger,
    	location may not meet map accuracy standard
    F98	Fault, low angle, normal slip, younger over older,
    	location may not meet map accuracy standard
    MH1	Marker horizon, buried paleosol, location meets map
    	accuracy standard
    
    
    L-SYMB calls up the appropriate line symbol from the lineset geoscamp2.lin (included in the data package)
    L-NAME formal name, where applicable, of geologic linear feature The Helendale Fault is the only formally named fault in the Cougar Buttes quadrangle.

    2) coug_str - structural lines
    Geologic stuctural features in the Cougar Buttes quadrangle include upright anticlines and upright synclines. The attribute values, L-TAG and L-SYMB, link the line tag to the data table, lines.rel and call up the appropriate line symbol from the lineset geoscamp2.lin respectively.
    
    COUG_STR.AAT:
    
    COLUMN   ITEM NAME        WIDTH OUTPUT  TYPE N.DEC  ALTERNATE NAME
        1  FNODE#                 4     5     B      -
        5  TNODE#                 4     5     B      -
        9  LPOLY#                 4     5     B      -
       13  RPOLY#                 4     5     B      -
       17  LENGTH                 8    18     F      5
       25  COUG_STR#              4     5     B      -
       29  COUG_STR-ID            4     5     B      -
       33  L-TAG                 25    25     C      -
       58  L-SYMB                 3     3     I      -
    
    
    
    List of line types used in the Cougar Buttes structural map coverage (coug _str.aat), including abbreviated descriptions from lines.rel:
    FA33	Fold axial trace, anticline, upright, location meets map
    	accuracy standard
    FA97	Fold axial trace, syncline, upright, location meets map
    	accuracy standard
    
    
    
    3) coug_pts - geological point data
    Geological point data includes information describing the types and the orientation of bedding, foliation, and lineations. One annotation subclass is included in the geologic points coverage: dip displays the respective dip and plunge values associated with individual point data.
    
    COUG_PTS.PAT:
    
    COLUMN   ITEM NAME        WIDTH OUTPUT  TYPE N.DEC  ALTERNATE NAME
        1  AREA                   8    18     F      5
        9  PERIMETER              8    18     F      5
       17  COUG_PTS#              4     5     B      -
       21  COUG_PTS-ID            4     5     B      -
       25  P-DIP                  3     3     I      -
       28  P-STRIKE               3     3     I      -
       31  P-SYMB                 3     3     I      -
       34  P-TAG                 25    25     C      -
       59  P-PLUNGE               3     3     I      -
       62  P-DIPDIR               3     3     I      -
    
    
    
    P-DIP the dip of planar features
    P-STRIKE the azimuth strike of planar features
    P-SYMB calls the point-type from the markerset geoscamp2.mrk (included in the data package)
    P-TAG point tag which consists of a character(s) and numerical value, e.g. FN42, allows the user to relate the point entity to its corresponding definition in the data table, points.rel
    Point types (quantitative orientation data) in coug_pts.pat and their corresponding, abbreviated descriptions from points.rel:

    
    B2	Bedding attitude, sedimentary, inclined
    FN42	Foliation attitude, metamorphic, inclined
    L26	Lineation, metamorphic, minor fold axes, sinistral
    	rotation
    
    
    P-PLUNGE lineation plunge value
    P-DIPDIR azimuthal direction of dip To date, there is no other way to indicate to the user the cardinal direction of dip using the traditional convention (traditional geologic notation allows a quadrant designation following the dip value).
    4) coug_ptsorn - structural line ornamentation
    The point data included in coug_ptsorn allow a visual representation of the type of structural linear feature, e.g. anticline and syncline symbols. The items P-TAG and P-SYMB link the point tag to its full description in points.rel and call up the appropriate point symbol from geoscamp2.mrk.
    
    COUG_PTSORN.PAT:
    
    COLUMN   ITEM NAME        WIDTH OUTPUT  TYPE N.DEC  ALTERNATE NAME
        1  AREA                   8    18     F      5
        9  PERIMETER              8    18     F      5
       17  COUG_PTSORN#           4     5     B      -
       21  COUG_PTSORN-ID         4     5     B      -
       25  P-TAG                 25    25     C      -
       50  P-SYMB                 3     3     I      -
    
    
    
    Point types (fold axes ornamentation) in coug_ptsorn.pat and their corresponding, abbreviated descriptions from points.rel:
    
    
    FAC10	Fold ornament, syncline, upright axial plane
    FAC4	Fold ornament, anticline, upright axial plane
    
    
    
    5) coug_ldr - annotation leaders
    Annotation leaders point to unit labels that are placed outside the perimeter of a particular geologic polygon. These cartographic line entities are attributed with only a single attribute, L-SYMB, and all have the same value, 1.
    
    COUG_LDR.AAT:
    
    COLUMN   ITEM NAME        WIDTH OUTPUT  TYPE N.DEC  ALTERNATE NAME
        1  FNODE#                 4     5     B      -
        5  TNODE#                 4     5     B      -
        9  LPOLY#                 4     5     B      -
       13  RPOLY#                 4     5     B      -
       17  LENGTH                 8    18     F      5
       25  COUG_LDR#              4     5     B      -
       29  COUG_LDR-ID            4     5     B      -
       33  L-SYMB                 3     3     I      -
    
    
    
    The data dictionary tables, lines.rel and points.rel each contain three items: L-TAG and P-TAG establish the links between the .aat, and the .pat to the respective data tables. The items L-DEF and P-DEF, respectively provide the coded definition for an entity. The items L-EXP and P-EXP provide a parsed explanation of the code contained in the corresponding -DEF items.
    Entity_and_Attribute_Detail_Citation:
    A complete description of the polygon, line, and point data coding schemes is available in U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Reports 97-859, OFR 97-860, and OFR 97-861 (full source citations follow):
    Matti, J.C., Miller, F.K., Powell, R.E., Kennedy, S.A., Bunyapanasarn, T.P., Koukladas, Catherine, Hauser, R.M., and Cossette, P.M., 1997b, Geologic-point attributes for digital geologic-map databases produced by the Southern California Areal Mapping Project (SCAMP), Version 1.0: U.S.Geological Survey Open-File Report 97-859
    Matti, J.C., Miller, F.K., Powell, R.E., Kennedy, S.A., and Cossette, P.M., 1997c, Geologic-polygon attributes for digital geologic-map databases produced by the Southern California Areal Mapping Project (SCAMP), Version 1.0: U.S.Geological Survey Open-File Report 97-860
    Matti, J.C., Powell, R.E., Miller, F.K., Kennedy, S.A., Ruppert, K.R., Morton, G.L., and Cossette, P.M., 1997a, Geologic-line attributes for digital geologic-map databases produced by the Southern California Areal Mapping Project (SCAMP), Version 1.0: U.S.Geological Survey Open-File Report 97-861

Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)
    • Robert E. Powell
    • Jonathan C. Matti
    • Pamela M. Cossette (digital compiler)
  2. Who also contributed to the data set?
    Our representation and interpretation of the surficial geology in the Cougar Buttes quadrangle has benefited from discussions about surficial processes in general and soils in particular with Leslie D. McFadden and Martha C. Eppes. Visits to soil pits dug by Martha C. Eppes and discussion of her findings in and around the Cougar Buttes quadrangle have contributed to our understanding of age and shallow subsurface relations among various units.
    Interpretation of the subsurface geology was made possible by access to water-monitoring well records provided by the Water Resources Division of the U.S. Geological Survey and by water-monitoring and water well records provided by the Mojave Water Agency and the California Department of Water Resources. Roland Hall retrieved the available records from the latter two agencies. Our interpretation of subsurface relations was enhanced by discussions with Jill N. Densmore-Judy and Peter Martin.
    In our mapping in the Cougar Buttes quadrangle, we were guided in part by the findings of previously published maps: (1) 1:24,000-scale mapping of the Blackhawk landslide by Shreve (1968), (2) 1:24,000-scale mapping of the quadrangle by Sadler (1982), and (3) 1:62,500-scale mapping of the quadrangle by Dibblee (1964).
    We thank Fred K. Miller for his notes and observations on plutonic rocks at various localities on Cougar Buttes, and for scribing the geologic map in preparation for scanning.
    Technical reviews by Scott C. Lundstrom and John C. Tinsley, III have led to significant improvements in the data base, the plot file, and in the discussion of the geology of the Cougar Buttes quadrangle in the accompanying summary pamphlet.
    Geologic mapping, topical studies, and digital preparation of this report were sponsored jointly by (1) the National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program of the U.S. Geological Survey, (2) the Mojave Water Agency, and (3) the U.S. Forest Service (San Bernardino National Forest). The U.S. Geological Survey's Photogrammetric Plotter Laboratory in Denver, Colorado (James Messerich, photogrammetrist) supported the transfer of geologic linework and point data from aerial photographs to a scale-stable cartographic base. In our digital preparation of the data set, carried out in the Spokane Field Office Geological Information System laboratory of the Mineral Resources Survey Program of the U.S. Geological Survey in Spokane, Washington, we received helpful assistance from Paul C. Hyndman and Rachel Hauser.
    Dibblee, T.W., Jr., 1964, Geologic map of the Lucerne Valley quadrangle, San Bernardino County, California: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Geologic Investigations Map I-426, scale 1:62,500.
    Sadler, P.M., 1982, Geologic map of the Cougar Buttes 7.5' quadrangle: California Division of Mines and Geology Open File Report OFR 82-18 S.F., Plate E, scale 1:24,000.
    Shreve, R.L., 1968, The Blackhawk landslide: Geological Society of America Special Paper 108, 47 p.
  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?
    Robert E. Powell
    U.S.Geological Survey, Western Region, Earth Surface Processes Team
    Project geologist
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Room 202
    West 904 Riverside Avenue
    Spokane, Washington
    USA

    (509) 368-3120 (voice)
    (509) 368-3199 (FAX)
    rpowell@usgs.gov

Why was the data set created?


The data set for the Cougar Buttes quadrangle has been prepared by the Southern California Areal Mapping Project (SCAMP), a cooperative project sponsored jointly by the U.S. Geological Survey and the California Division of Mines and Geology, as part of an ongoing effort to utilize a Geographical Information System (GIS) format to create a regional digital geologic database for southern California. This regional database is being developed as a contribution to the National Geologic Map Data Base of the National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program of the USGS. Development of the data set for the Cougar Buttes quadrangle has also been supported by the Mojave Water Agency and U.S. Forest Service, San Bernardino National Forest.
The digital geologic map database for the Cougar Buttes quadrangle has been created as a general-purpose data set that is applicable to other land-related investigations in the earth and biological sciences. In cooperation with the Water Resources Division of the U.S. Geological Survey, we have used our mapping in the Cougar Buttes and adjoining quadrangles together with well log data to develop a hydrogeologic framework for the basin. In an effort to understand surficial processes and to provide a base suitable for ecosystem assessment, we have differentiated surficial veneers on piedmont and pediment surfaces and distinguished the various substrates found beneath these veneers. Currently, the geologic database for the Cougar Buttes quadrangle is being applied in groundwater investigations in the Lucerne Valley basin (USGS, Water Resources Division), in biological species studies of the Cushenbury Canyon area (U.S. Forest Service, San Bernardino National Forest), and in the study of soils on various Quaternary landscape surfaces on the north piedmont of the San Bernardino Mountains (University of New Mexico). The Cougar Buttes database is not suitable for site-specific geologic evaluations at scales greater than 1:24,000 (1 in = 2,000 ft).

How was the data set created?

  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?
  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?
    Date: 1995 (process 1 of 7)
    Field mapping and aerial photograph interpretation; iterative process (J.C. Matti).
    Date: 1995 (process 2 of 7)
    Transfer of geologic linework and point data from aerial photographs to a scale-stable cartographic base for south-central part of quadrangle at the U.S. Geological Survey's Photogrammetric Plotter Laboratory in Denver, Colorado (J.C. Matti).
    Date: 1995 (process 3 of 7)
    Field mapping and aerial photograph interpretation; iterative process (R.E. Powell and J.C. Matti).
    Date: 1998 (process 4 of 7)
    Transfer of geologic linework and point data from aerial photographs to a scale-stable transparent orthophotoquadrangle (R.E. Powell).
    Date: 01-Feb-2000 (process 5 of 7)
    The geologic map information was scanned (initial raster scan in MS-DOS TIF format, 1200 dots per inch) from a base-stable original of the author-prepared geologic map at 1:24,000 scale. Normally, the base-stable original for scanning would be produced from scribeguide to clear-film, right-reading, 0.007 mil thickness, blackline positive. For the Cougar Buttes quadrangle, however, it was produced from scribeguide to clear-film, left-reading, 0.004 mil thickness, blackline positive. This original was sandwiched with a mylar sheet to bring the thickness to 0.007 mil, then digitally reversed to right-reading by Optronics Specialty Company, Inc.The auto-vectorized, non-attributed scan was prepared by Optronics and converted to an ARC/INFO coverage using standard ARC/INFO commands. Registration and transformation were subsequently completed.
    Geologic lines, and polygons are represented in the geology coverage. Geologic points such as attitudes were digitized into a separate geologic points coverage using a Mayline Futur-Matic digitizing table.
    Lines, points, and polygons were edited and attributed using standard ARC/INFO commands. Digitizing and editing artifacts significant enough to display at a scale of 1:24,000 were corrected.
    The base map image was prepared by scanning a scale-stable clear-film of the U.S. Geological Survey, 1:24,000 Cougar Buttes 7.5'quadrangle (1971) topographic map. Scanning was done using an Anatech Eagle 4080 monochrome 800 dots per inch (dpi) scanner, at a resolution of 500dpi. The raster scan was converted to a monochromatic image (Geotiff format) in ARC/INFO. No elements of the base layer are attributed. The base map is provided for reference only.
    Date: 25-Jan-2000 (process 6 of 7)
    First draft of metadata created by Pamela M. Cossette using FGDCMETA.AML ver. 1.2 05/14/98 on ARC/INFO data set /pool5/c/cossette2/cougar/coug/coug_geo
    Date: 27-Jul-2000 (process 7 of 7)
    Creation of original metadata record Person who carried out this activity:
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Attn: Robert E. Powell
    Project geologist
    904 West Riverside Avenue, Rm. 202
    Spokane, WA
    USA

    (509) 368-3120 (voice)
    (509) 368-3199 (FAX)
    rpowell@usgs.gov
  3. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?
    Miller, Fred K., Matti, Jonathan C., Brown, Howard J., and Powell, Robert E., 1998, Geologic map of the Fawnskin 7.5' quadrangle, San Bernardino County, California, version 1.0: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report USGS OFR 98-579, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California.

    Online Links:


How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?
    Geologic lines and points on 1:24,000 scale geologic maps are judged to meet map-accuracy standards if they are located to within +/-15 meters, relative to topographic or cultural features on the base map.
    Lines and points that meet (or may not meet) this map-accuracy standard are identified both in the digital database and on derivative geologic-map plots.
    Within the database, line and point data that are judged to meet the map-accuracy standard are denoted by the attribute code .MEE. (meets) in the appropriate data table; line and point data that may not meet the map-accuracy standard are denoted by the attribute code .MNM. (may not meet).
    On any derivative geologic-map plot, line data that are judged to meet the map-accuracy standard are denoted by solid lines; line data that may not meet the map-accuracy atandard are denoted by dashed or dotted lines. There is no cartographic device for denoting the map-accuracy for geologic-point data (eg. symbols representing bedding, foliation, lineations, etc.).
  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?
    The maximum transformation RMS error acceptable for 7.5' quadrangle transformation and data input is 0.003 (1.8 meters). Horizontal positional accuracy was checked by visual comparison of hard-copy plots with base-stable source data.
    Transformation data (initial DXF scan data format to ARC/INFO coverage) for the Cougar Buttes quadrangle are as follows:
    Scale (X,Y) = (609.687,609.887)  Skew (degrees) = (0.000)
    Rotation (degrees) = (-0.041)  Translation = (-6359.613,-768.716)
    RMS Error (input,output) = (0.001,0.847)
    
    Affine  X = Ax + By + C
            Y = Dx + Ey + F
      A =          609.687   B =            0.437   C =        -6359.613
      D =           -0.440   E =          609.887   F =         -768.716
    
    
    
  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?
  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?
    The geologic map and digital database of the Cougar Buttes 7.5' quadrangle contain new data that have been subjected to rigorous review and are a substantially complete representation of the current state of knowledge concerning the geology of the quadrangle.
  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?
    Polygon and chain-node topology present.
    The areal extent of the map is represented digitally by an appropriately projected (Polyconic projection), mathematically generated box. Consequently, polygons intersecting the lines that comprise the map boundary are closed by that boundary. Polygons internal to the map boundary are completely enclosed by line segments which are themselves a set of sequentially numbered coordinate pairs. Point data are represented by coordinate pairs.


How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?
Access_Constraints: None
Use_Constraints:
The Cougar Buttes 7.5' geologic-map database should be used to evaluate and understand the geologic character of the Cougar Buttes quadrangle as a whole. The data should not be used for purposes of site-specific land-use planning or site-specific geologic evaluations. The database is sufficiently detailed to identify and characterize many actual and potential geologic hazards represented by faults and landslides. However, it is not sufficiently detailed for site-specific determinations or evaluations of those features. Faults shown do not take the place of fault-rupture hazard zones designated by the California State Geologist (see Hart, 1988).
Use of the Cougar Buttes geologic-map database should not violate the spatial resolution of the data. Although the digital form of the data removes the constraint imposed by the scale of any derivative maps, the detail and accuracy issues inherent in map scale limitations are also present in the digital data. The fact that this database was edited at a scale of 1:24,000 means that higher-resolution data generally are not present in the dataset. Plotting at scales larger than 1:24,000 will not yield greater, real detail, although it may reveal fine-scale irregularities beyond the intended resolution of the database. Similarly, although higher-resolution data is incorporated at a few places, the resolution of the combined output will be limited by the lower-resolution data.
This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Hart, E. W., 1988, Fault-rupture zones in California; Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones Act of 1972 with index to special studies zones maps: California Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42
  1. Who distributes the data set? (Distributor 1 of 1)
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Attn: Robert E. Powell
    Project geologist
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Room 202
    West 904 Riverside Avenue
    Spokane, WA
    USA

    509 368-3120 (voice)
    rpowell@usgs.gov
  2. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set?
  3. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?
    The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) provides these geographic data "as is. "The USGS makes no guarantee or warranty concerning the accuracy of information contained in the geographic data. The USGS further makes no warranties, either expressed or implied as to any other matter whatsoever, including, without limitation, the condition of the product, or its fitness for any particular purpose. The burden for determining fitness for use lies entirely with the user. Although these data have been processed successfully on computers at the USGS, no warranty, expressed or implied, is made by the USGS regarding the use of these data on any other system, nor does the fact of distribution constitute or imply any such warranty.
    In no event shall the USGS have any liability whatsoever for payment of any consequential, incidental, indirect, special, or tort damages of any kind, including, but not limited to, any loss of profits arising out of use of or reliance on the geographic data or arising out of the delivery, installation, operation, or support by USGS.
    This digital, geologic map database of the Cougar Buttes 7.5'quadrangle, 1:24,000 map-scale, and any derivative maps thereof, is not meant to be used or displayed at any scale larger than 1:24,000 (e.g., 1:12,000).
  4. How can I download or order the data?

Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 05-Feb-2016
Metadata author:
Peter N Schweitzer
USGS Midwest Area
Collection manager, USGS Geoscience Data Clearinghouse, http://geo-nsdi.er.usgs.gov/
Mail Stop 954
12201 Sunrise Valley Dr
Reston, VA
USA

703-648-6533 (voice)
703-648-6252 (FAX)
pschweitzer@usgs.gov
Metadata standard:
FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata (FGDC-STD-001-1998)

This page is <https://geo-nsdi.er.usgs.gov/metadata/open-file/00-175/metadata.faq.html>
Generated by mp version 2.9.48 on Tue Jul 03 20:05:23 2018