Geologic map of the Chewelah 30' x 60' quadrangle, Washington and Idaho

Metadata also available as - [Outline] - [Parseable text] - [XML]

Frequently anticipated questions:


What does this data set describe?

Title:
Geologic map of the Chewelah 30' x 60' quadrangle, Washington and Idaho
Abstract:
This data set maps and describes the geology of the Chewelah 30' X 60' quadrangle, Washington and Idaho. Created using Environmental Systems Research Institute's ARC/INFO software, the data base consists of the following items: (1) a map coverage containing geologic contacts and units, (2) a point coverage containing site-specific geologic structural data, (3) two coverages derived from 1:100,000 Digital Line Graphs (DLG); one of which represents topographic data, and the other, cultural data, (4) two line coverages that contain cross-section lines and unit-label leaders, respectively, and (5) attribute tables for geologic units (polygons), contacts (arcs), and site-specific data (points). In addition, the data set includes the following graphic and text products: (1) A PostScript graphic plot-file containing the geologic map, topography, cultural data, and two cross sections, and on a separate sheet, a Correlation of Map Units (CMU) diagram, an abbreviated Description of Map Units (DMU), modal diagrams for granitic rocks, an index map, a regional geologic and structure map, and a key for point and line symbols; (2) PDF files of the Readme text-file and expanded Description of Map Units (DMU), and (3) this metadata file.
The geologic map database contains original U.S. Geological Survey data generated by detailed field observation and by interpretation of aerial photographs. The map was compiled from geologic maps of eight 1:48,000 15' quadrangle blocks, each of which was made by mosaicing and reducing the four constituent 7.5' quadrangles. These 15' quadrangle blocks were mapped chiefly at 1:24,000 scale, but the detail of the mapping was governed by the intention that it was to be compiled at 1:48,000 scale. The compilation at 1:100,000 scale entailed necessary simplification in some areas and combining of some geologic units. Overall, however, despite a greater than two times reduction in scale, most geologic detail found on the 1:48,000 maps is retained on the 1:100,000 map. Geologic contacts across boundaries of the eight constituent quadrangles required minor adjustments, but none significant at the final 1:100,000 scale.
The geologic map was compiled on a base-stable cronoflex copy of the Chewelah 30' X 60' topographic base and then scribed. The scribe guide was used to make a 0.007 mil-thick blackline clear-film, which was scanned at 1200 DPI by Optronics Specialty Company, Northridge, California. This image was converted to vector and polygon GIS layers and minimally attributed by Optronics Specialty Company. Minor hand-digitized additions were made at the USGS. Lines, points, and polygons were subsequently edited at the USGS by using standard ARC/INFO commands. Digitizing and editing artifacts significant enough to display at a scale of 1:100,000 were corrected. Within the database, geologic contacts are represented as lines (arcs), geologic units as polygons, and site-specific data as points. Polygon, arc, and point attribute tables (.pat, .aat, and .pat, respectively) uniquely identify each geologic datum.
Supplemental_Information:
Data package contents:
chew_geo.e00   Contacts, faults, geologic unit labels
chew_pts.e00   Attitudes and their dip values.  Dip values plotted
               as annotation.
chew_xs.e00    lines of cross sections
chew_ldr.e00   unit label leaders
chew_hyps.e00  Topography
chew_trans.e00 Roads, cultural information
lines.rel.e00  Line dictionary
points.rel.e00 Point dictionary
scamp2.shd.e00 SCAMP shade set
  1. How might this data set be cited?
    Miller, F.K., 2000, Geologic map of the Chewelah 30' x 60' quadrangle, Washington and Idaho: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-2354, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California.

    Online Links:

  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?
    West_Bounding_Coordinate: -117.90475192
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: -117.00015348
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: -41.8011956
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: -42.30937889
  3. What does it look like?
    http://pubs.usgs.gov/mf/2001/2354/images/chew.gif (GIF)
    400x469 24-bit color image of the whole map sheet, intended to show only the overal layout, not details of the geographic features.
  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?
    Beginning_Date: 19630701
    Ending_Date: 09-Oct-1989
    Currentness_Reference:
    Period during which data were gathered
  5. What is the general form of this data set?
    Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?
    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?
      This is a Vector data set. It contains the following vector data types (SDTS terminology):
      • Point (3269)
      • String (7795)
      • GT-polygon composed of chains (3270)
    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?
      Grid_Coordinate_System_Name: Universal Transverse Mercator
      Planar coordinates are encoded using coordinate pair
      Abscissae (x-coordinates) are specified to the nearest 7.455918788909
      Ordinates (y-coordinates) are specified to the nearest 7.455918788909
      Planar coordinates are specified in Meters
      The horizontal datum used is North American Datum of 1927.
      The ellipsoid used is Clarke 1866.
      The semi-major axis of the ellipsoid used is 6378206.4.
      The flattening of the ellipsoid used is 1/294.98.
  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?
    Entity_and_Attribute_Overview:
    Version 1.0 of the Chewelah 30' x 60' geologic map database comprises six coverages, of which two contain geologic data, two contain DLG derived geo-reference data, and two contain cartographic line entities.
    Geologic data represented by line entities and the polygons they delineate are contained in the coverage CHEW_GEO. For display purposes, the geology coverage contains two annotation subclasses: anno.geo contains unit labels, and anno.fault contains formal, fault names.
    Feature attribution and item definitions are as follows:
    CHEW_GEO.PAT:
    
    COLUMN   ITEM NAME        WIDTH OUTPUT  TYPE N.DEC  ALTERNATE NAME
        1  AREA                   4    12     F      3
        5  PERIMETER              4    12     F      3
        9  CHEW_GEO#              4     5     B      -
       13  CHEW_GEO-ID            4     5     B      -
       17  LABL                  35    35     C      -
       52  PLABL                 35    35     C      -
       87  SHDPS                  3     3     I      -
       90  SHDFIL                 3     3     I      -
       93  NAME                 320   320     C      -
    
    LABL geologic map unit label, in plain text
    The following geologic units (LABL) and their corresponding names (NAME) are identified in the Chewelah 30' x 60'quadrangle:
    Qm	Mine tailings
    Qls	Landslide deposits
    Qag	Galcial and alluvial deposits
    QTs	Consolidated alluvial and (or) glacial deposits
    Tcl	Clay deposits
    Tcr	Columbia River Basalt Group
    Tt	Tiger Formation
    Tcs	Conglomerate and sedimentary breccia
    Tcb	Chlorite breccia and cataclastic rocks associated
    		with the Newport Fault
    Tcc	Tectonic breccia of Cusick Creek
    Tbl	Cataclastic rocks of Bayley Lake
    Ts	Sanpoil Volcanics
    Thd	Hypabyssal dikes
    Tsp	Silver Point Quartz Monzonite
    Tam	Quartz monzodiorite of Ahern Meadows
    Tll	Quartz monzonite of Loon Lake
    To	O'Brien Creek Formation
    Kmm	Monzogranite of Midnight Mine
    Klr	Monzogranite of Little Roundtop
    Kbgm	Muscovite monzogranite of Blue Grouse Mountain
    Ksh	Starvation Flat Quartz Monzonite, hornblende-biotite
    		monzogranite and granodiorite
    Ksha	Starvation Flat Quartz Monzonite, Arden pluton
    Kfl	Fan Lake Granodiorite
    Kc	Biotite monzogranite of Camden
    Kdc	Two-mica granodiorite of Dubius Creek
    Kgp	Galena Point Ganodiorite
    Kb	Blickensderfer Quartz Monzonite
    Khlc	Granodiorite of Hall Mountain, Loop Creek pluton
    Kpl	Phillips Lake Granodiorite
    Kli	Leucocratic intrusive rocks
    Knb	Two-mica monzogranite of North Basin
    Knc	Monzogranite of Narcisse Creek
    Kbm	Monzogranite of Big Meadows
    Koc	Monzogranite of Otter Creek
    Klgs	Leucocratic granitic rocks of Scotia
    Ksv	Granodiorite of Spring Valley
    Kbr	Two-mica monzogranite of Blanchard Road
    KJcc	Hornblende-biotite quartz diorite of Cusick Creek
    Jlm	Quartz monzodiorite of Lane Mountain
    MzPzf	Fault-zone rocks
    JTrft	Flowery Trail Granodiorite
    MCu	Carbonate and clastic sedimentary rocks, undivided
    Ml	Limestone
    MD3	Dolomite and slate
    MD2	White and pale-gray dolomite
    MD1	Dark-gray dolomite
    Ddl	Dolomite and limestone
    Ol	Ledbetter Formation
    OCgc	Phyllite and quartzite of Gardiner Creek
    OCmu	Metaline Formation, undivided part
    OCms	Metaline Formation, shaly limestone member
    OCmd	Metaline Formation, thick-bedded dolomite member
    OCml	Metaline Formation, thick- and thin-bedded
    		limestone member
    OCmld	Metaline Formation, dark-gray dolomite beds
    OCmq	Metaline Formation, limestone and
    		carbonate-bearing quartzite member
    CZau	Addy Quartzite, undivided part
    Cau	Addy Quartzite, upper member
    Cac	Addy Quartzite, coarse-grained member
    CZap	Addy Quartzite, purple member
    Zal	Addy Quartzite, lower member
    Zmu	Monk Formation, undivided part
    Zma	Monk Formation, argillite member
    Zmc	Monk Formation, conglomerate member
    Zmg	Monk Formation, greenstone member
    Zhg	Huckleberry Formation, greenstone member
    Zhgc	Huckleberry Formation, volcanic conglomerate
    Zhi	Huckleberry Formation, intrusive greenstone
    Zhc	Huckleberry Formation, conglomerate member
    Ydtu	Deer Trail Group, undivided part
    Ybu	Buffalo Hump Formation, undivided part
    Yba	Buffalo Hump Formation, argillite
    Ybq	Buffalo Hump Formation, quartzite
    Ys	Stensgar Dolomite
    Ym	McHale Slate
    Ywcu	Wabash Detroit Formation and Chamokane
    		Formation, undivided
    Ywd	Wabash Detroit Formation
    Ywdg	Wabash Detroit Formation, greenstone
    Ycc	Chamokane Creek Formation, carbonate-bearing rocks
    Yccq	Chamokane Creek Formation, vitreous quartzite
    		and argillite
    Yt	Togo Formation
    Ybmh	Bonner Formation, Mount Shields Formation, and
    		argillite of Half Moon Lake, undivided
    Ybo	Bonner Formation
    Yms5	Mount Shields Formation, Member 5
    Yms4	Mount Shields Formation, Member 4
    Yms3	Mount Shields Formation, Member 3
    Yhm	Argillite of Half Moon Lake
    Yssh	Shepard Formation, Snowslip Formation, undivided
    Yssw	Shepard Formation, Snowslip Formation, and
    		Wallace Formation, undivided
    Ysh	Shepard Formation
    Ywr	Wallace Formation and Ravalli Group, undivided
    Yss	Snowslip Formation
    Yw	Wallace Formation
    Ye	Empire Formation
    Ysr	St. Regis Formation
    Yr	Revett Formation
    Ybk	Burke Formation
    Yd	Mafic sills
    Yp	Prichard Formation
    Ypm	Metamorphosed part of the Prichard Formation
    Ynl	Newman Lake Gneiss
    sgg	Schist, gneiss, and leucocratic granitic rocks
    
    Bodies of water are designated - water body.
    PLABL coded geologic map unit label used to generate plot labels with relevant stratigraphic symbols. The geologic units with LABL designating Paleozoic (Pz), Cambrian (C), Mesozoic (Mz), and Triassic (Tr) have PLABL with substitute characters, |, _, }, and ^ respectively, that call their corresponding symbols from the GeoAge Font Group. Geologic map unit labels will plot on derivative map plots with appropriate stratigraphic symbols if PLABL is used as the source for unit labels. The GeoAge Font Group is accessed through geofont.txt. The GeoAGe Font Group and relevant information are available via annonymous FTP:
    Server:  onyx.wr.usgs.gov
    UserID:  anonymous
    Passwd:  your email address
    Directory:  /pub/wpg/supplies/geoage/mac (for Macintosh fonts)
                /pub/wpg/supplies/geoage/unix_and_nt (Unix and Windows fonts)
    
    SHDPS polygon color from shadeset scamp2.shd (included in the data package)
    SHDFIL polygon fill pattern from shadeset geology2.shd (included in the data package)
    NAME geologic name of each unit
    Geologic lines, which include features such as faults, and contacts are attributed with the following set of feature attribute items contained in chew_geo.aat. (A complete description of each line type is available in the data table, lines.rel.)
    CHEW_GEO.AAT:
    
    COLUMN   ITEM NAME        WIDTH OUTPUT  TYPE N.DEC  ALTERNATE NAME
        1  FNODE#                 4     5     B      -
        5  TNODE#                 4     5     B      -
        9  LPOLY#                 4     5     B      -
       13  RPOLY#                 4     5     B      -
       17  LENGTH                 4    12     F      3
       21  CHEW_GEO#              4     5     B      -
       25  CHEW_GEO-ID            4     5     B      -
       29  L-TAG                 25    25     C      -
       54  L-SYMB                 3     3     I      -
       57  L-NAME               200   200     C      -
    
    L-TAG line attribute which consists of a character and numerical value, e.g. C17, allows the user to relate the line entity to its corresponding definition in lines.rel
    List of line types used in the Chewelah geologic map coverage (chew_geo), including abbreviated descriptions from lines.rel:
    C17	Contact, landslide, location meets map accuracy standard
    C29	Contact, sedimentary, location meets map accuracy standard
    C31	Contact, sedimentary, inferred, location may not meet map
    	accuracy standard
    C42	Contact, sedimentary, gradational, location may not meet map
    	accuracy standard
    C49	Contact, igneous, location meets map accuracy standard
    C51	Contact, igneous, inferred, location may not meet map
    	accuracy standard
    
    C58 Contact, igneous, gradational, location may not meet map
    	accuracy standard
    C67	Contact, metamorphic, inferred, location may not meet map
    	accuracy standard
    C99	Contact, igneaous, scratch boundary
    CL1	Cartographic line, map boundary
    CL2	Cartographic line, water boundary
    F1	Fault, high angle, slip unspecified, generic, location meets map
    	accuracy standard
    F4	Fault, high angle, normal slip, location meets map accuracy
    	standard
    F5	Fault, high angle, reverse slip, location meets map accuracy
    	standard
    F7	Fault, high angle, slip unspecified, location meets map accuracy
    	standard
    
    F10 Fault, high angle, normal slip, location may not meet map
    	accuracy standard
    F11	Fault, high angle, reverse slip, location may not meet map
    	accuracy standard
    F19	Fault, high angle, slip unspecified, inferred beneath mapped
    	covering unit, location may not meet map accuracy standard
    F22	Fault, high angle, normal slip, inferred beneath mapped
    	covering unit, location may not meet map accuracy standard
    F23	Fault, high angle, reverse slip, inferred beneath mapped
    	covering unit, location may not meet map accuracy standard
    F40	Fault, high angle, normal slip, existence questionable, inferred
    	beneath mapped covering unit, location may not meet map
    	accuracy standard
    F83	Fault, low angle, slip unspecified, younger over older, inferred,
    	location may not meet map accuracy standard
    F84	Fault, low angle, slip unspecified, younger over older, inferred
    	beneath mapped covering unit, location may not meet map accuracy
    	standard
    F113	Fault, low angle, normal slip, younger over older, detachment,
    	location meets map accuracy standard
    F114	Fault, low angle, normal slip, younger over older, detachment,
    	location may not meet map accuracy standard
    F116	Fault, low angle, normal slip, younger over older, detachment,
    	inferred beneath mapped covering unit, location may not meet
    	map accuracy standard
    F87N	Fault, low angle, slip unspecified, younger over older,
    	existence questionable, inferred beneath mapped covering unit,
    	location may not meet map accuracy standard
    
    L-SYMB stores appropriate line symbol value from the lineset geoscamp2.lin (included in the data package)
    L-NAME formal name of fault
    Geological point data includes site-specific information describing the types and the orientation of bedding, foliation, and lineations. One annotation subclass is included in the geologic points coverage, CHEW_PTS: anno.dip displays the respective dip and plunge values associated with individual point data.
    Feature attribution and item definitions are as follows:
    CHEW_PTS.PAT:
    
    COLUMN   ITEM NAME        WIDTH OUTPUT  TYPE N.DEC  ALTERNATE NAME
        1  AREA                   4    12     F      3
        5  PERIMETER              4    12     F      3
        9  CHEW_PTS#              4     5     B      -
       13  CHEW_PTS-ID            4     5     B      -
       17  P-SYMB                 3     3     I      -
       20  P-TAG                 25    25     C      -
       45  P-DIP                  3     3     I      -
       48  P-STRIKE               3     3     I      -
       51  P-DIPDIR               3     3     I      -
       54  P-PLUNGE               3     3     I      -
       57  P-BEARING              3     3     I      -
    
    P-SYMB calls the point-type from the markerset geoscamp2.mrk (included in the data package)
    P-TAG point tag which consists of a character(s) and numerical value, e.g. FN42, allows the user to relate the point entity to its corresponding definition in the data table, points.rel
    Point types (quantitative orientation data) in chew_pts.pat and their corresponding, abbreviated descriptions from points.rel:
    B1	Bedding, horizontal, sedimentary rocks
    B2	Bedding, inclined, sedimentary rocks
    B4	Bedding, vertical, sedimentary rocks
    B6	Bedding, overturned, sedimentary rocks
    B11	Bedding, wavy or crinkled, inclined, sedimentary rocks
    B27	Bedding, inclined, volcanogenic rocks
    FN13	Foliation, primary igneous, inclined
    FN14	Foliation, primary igneous, vertical
    FN42	Foliation, metamorphic, inclined
    FN43	Foliation, metamorphic, vertical
    CLV2	Cleavage, inclined
    CLV4	Cleavage, vertical
    L12	Lineation, crushed and streaked mineral grains, horizontal
    L14	Lineation, crushed and streaked mineral grains, inclined
    L37	Lineation, metamorphic, minor fold axis
    
    P-DIP the dip of planar features
    P-STRIKE the azimuth strike of planar features
    P-DIPDIR azimuthal direction of dip
    At present, it is not possible to indicate the cardinal direction of dip using traditional conventions (traditional geologic notation allows a quadrant designation following the dip value).
    P-PLUNGE lineation plunge value
    P-BEARING azimuthal bearing of plunge
    The two coverages that provide base-map (DLG derived) geo-reference information are CHEW_HYPS (topographic contour data) and CHEW_TRANS (cultural data/roads). Both are line coverages.
    In order to facilitate plotting of the topographic information available in CHEW_HYPS, original DLG-derived attribution was retained and two additional attributes added, LTYPE and ELEV. The added attributes allow the user to descriminate between, and selectively plot, contour data.
    Similarly, in addition to the original DLG-derived transportation attribution available in CHEW_TRANS, three additional attributes were added, LTYPE, USROUTE, and STROUTE. They permit the user to identify and selectively plot the various road types included in the DLG data.
    Cartographic line entities are contained in CHEW_XS (two cross-section traces) and CHEW_LDR (unit label leaders). These line entities have only one attribute, L-SYMB, and all have the same value, 1.
    Entity_and_Attribute_Detail_Citation:
    A complete description of the polygon, line, and point data coding schemes is available in U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Reports OFR 97-859, OFR 97-860, and OFR 97-861 (full source citations follow):
    Matti, J.C., Miller, F.K., Powell, R.E., Kennedy, S.A., Bunyapanasarn, T.P., Koukladas, Catherine, Hauser, R.M., and Cossette, P.M., 1997b, Geologic-point attributes for digital geologic-map databases produced by the Southern California Areal Mapping Project (SCAMP), Version 1.0: U.S.Geological Survey Open-File Report 97-859
    Matti, J.C., Miller, F.K., Powell, R.E., Kennedy, S.A., and Cossette, P.M., 1997c, Geologic-polygon attributes for digital geologic-map databases produced by the Southern California Areal Mapping Project (SCAMP), Version 1.0: U.S.Geological Survey Open-File Report 97-860
    Matti, J.C., Powell, R.E., Miller, F.K., Kennedy, S.A., Ruppert, K.R., Morton, G.L., and Cossette, P.M., 1997a, Geologic-line attributes for digital geologic-map databases produced by the Southern California Areal Mapping Project (SCAMP), Version 1.0: U.S.Geological Survey Open-File Report 97-861

Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)
    • F.K. Miller
  2. Who also contributed to the data set?
    Technical review by Rowland Tabor and Kenneth Fox led to significant improvements that eventually were reflected in aspects of the database, the plot file, and in the description of the geologic units of the Chewelah 30' X 60' quadrangle.
    Geologic mapping and digital preparation of this report were sponsored jointly by (1) the National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program of the U.S. Geological Survey, (2) the Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources, (3) the Southern California Areal Mapping Project (SCAMP), and (4) the Mineral Resources Program of the U.S. Geological Survey. In our digital preparation of the data set, carried out in the Geographic Information System laboratory of the Mineral Resources Program of the U.S. Geological Survey in Spokane, Washington by Pamela M. Cossette and Pamela D. Derkey, we received valuable assistance from Paul C. Hyndman and from Rachel Hauser at the SCAMP Geographic Information System laboratory in Riverside, California.
  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?
    Fred K. Miller
    U.S. Geological Survey, Western Region, Earth Surface Processes Team
    Project geologist
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Room 202
    West 904 Riverside Avenue
    Spokane, Washington
    United States of America

    (509) 368-3121 (voice)
    (509) 368-3199 (FAX)
    fmiller@usgs.gov

Why was the data set created?

The data set for the Chewelah 30' X 60' quadrangle has been jointly prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey Mineral Resource Program, the Southern California Areal Mapping Project (SCAMP), and the Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources, as part of an ongoing effort to utilize a Geographical Information System (GIS) format to create regional digital geologic databases. These regional databases are being developed as contributions to the National Geologic Map Data Base of the National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program of the USGS.
The digital geologic map database for the Chewelah 30' X 60' quadrangle has been created as a general-purpose data set that is applicable to other land-related investigations in the earth and biological sciences. For example, it can be used for mineral resource evaluation studies, animal and plant habitat studies, and soil studies in the Colville and Kaniksu National Forests. The database is not suitable for site-specific geologic evaluations.

How was the data set created?

  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?
  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?
    Date: 1963 (process 1 of 7)
    Field mapping and aerial photograph interpretation; iterative process (F.K. Miller).
    Date: 1989 (process 2 of 7)
    Transfer of geologic linework and point data from field maps and aerial photographs to a scale-stable cartographic base of quadrangle (scribe guide) (F.K. Miller).
    Date: 1997 (process 3 of 7)
    The geologic map information was scanned (initial raster scan in MS-DOS TIF format, 1200 dots per inch) from a clear-film, right-reading, 0.007 mil thickness, base-stable blackline positive (made by contact photograph from a scribe guide) of the author-prepared geologic map at 1:100,000 scale. The raster scan was auto-vectorized, converted to an ARC/INFO coverage using standard ARC/INFO commands, and minimally attributed by Optronics Specialty Company, Inc. Preliminary attribution and editing was completed in Spokane by Mineral Resource Program personnel (P.D. Derkey).
    Date: 1998 (process 4 of 7)
    ARC/INFO database revised; polygon, arc and point attribute tables updated using model established for SCAMP coverages. Digitizing and editing artifacts significant enough to display at a scale of 1:100,000 were corrected (P.M. Cossette).
    Date: 1999 (process 5 of 7)
    The two coverages that provide base map reference data (hypsography/topography, and transportation/cultural information) were derived from USGS 1:100,000-scale DLGs available on the web
    Date: 13-Jun-2000 (process 6 of 7)
    First draft of metadata created by P.Cossette using FGDCMETA.AML ver. 1.2 06/13/98 on ARC/INFO data set /pool5/c/cossette2/chewelah/chew_geo0609
    Date: 11-Jan-2001 (process 7 of 7)
    Creation of original metadata record Person who carried out this activity:
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Attn: Pamela M Cossette
    Geographer
    904 West Riverside Avenue, Rm. 202
    Spokane, Washington
    USA

    509-368-3123 (voice)
    509-368-3199 (FAX)
    pcossette@usgs.gov
  3. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?
    Waggoner, Stephanie Z., 1990, Geologic Map of the Chewelah 30' x 60' quadrangle, Washington and Idaho: Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Open-File Report Open File Report 90-14, Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, Washington.


How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?
    Geologic-map units in the Chewelah quadrangle database were described using standard field methods. Consistent with these methods, the database author has assigned standard geologic attributes to geologic lines, points, and polygons identified in the database.
    Nation-wide geologic-map accuracy standards have not been developed and adopted by the U.S. Geological Survey and other earth-science entities. Until such standards are adopted, the SCAMP project has developed internal map-accuracy standards for 1:100,000-scale geologic maps produced by the project.
    Geologic lines and points on 1:100,000 scale geologic maps are judged to meet SCAMP's internal map-accuracy standards if they are located to within +/-50 meters, relative to topographic or cultural features on the base map.
    Lines and points that meet (or may not meet) this SCAMP internal map-accuracy standard are identified both in the digital database and on derivative geologic-map plots. Within the database, line and point data that are judged to meet the SCAMP internal map-accuracy standard are denoted by the attribute code .MEE. (meets)in the appropriate data table; line and point data that may not meet the SCAMP internal map-accuracy standard are denoted by the attribute code .MNM. (may not meet).
    On any derivative geologic-map plot, line data that are judged to meet the SCAMP internal map-accuracy standard are denoted by solid lines; line data that may not meet the SCAMP internal map-accuracy standard are denoted by dashed or dotted lines. There is no cartographic device for denoting the map-accuracy for geologic-point data (eg. symbols representing bedding, foliation, lineations, etc.).
  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?
    The maximum transformation RMS error acceptable for 30' x60' quadrangle transformation and data input is 0.003 (7.6 meters). Horizontal positional accuracy was checked by visual comparison of hard-copy plots with base-stable source data.
    Transformation data for the Chewelah quadrangle are as follows:
    Scale (X,Y) = (2540.622,2540.193)  Skew (degrees) = (0.004)
    Rotation (degrees) = (-0.377)  Translation = (421268.260,311632.232)
    RMS Error (input,output) = (0.003,7.674)
    
    Affine  X = Ax + By + C
            Y = Dx + Ey + F
      A =         2540.567   B =           16.874   C =       421268.260
      D =          -16.718   E =         2540.137   F =       311632.232
    
    
  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?
  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?
    The geologic map and digital database of the Chewelah 30'x 60' quadrangle contain new data that have been subjected to rigorous review and are a substantially complete representation of the current state of knowledge concerning the geology of the quadrangle.
  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?
    Polygon and chain-node topology present.
    The areal extent of the map is represented digitally by an appropriately projected (UTM projection), mathematically generated box. Consequently, polygons intersecting the lines that comprise the map boundary are closed by that boundary. Polygons internal to the map boundary are completely enclosed by line segments which are themselves a set of sequentially numbered coordinate pairs. Point data are represented by coordinate pairs.

How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?
Access_Constraints: None
Use_Constraints:
The Chewelah 30' X 60' geologic-map database should be used to evaluate and understand the geologic character of the Chewelah 30' X 60' quadrangle as a whole. The data should not be used for purposes of site-specific land-use planning or site-specific geologic evaluations. The database is sufficiently detailed to identify and characterize geologic materials and structures. However, it is not sufficiently detailed for site-specific determinations.
Use of this digital geologic-map database should not violate the spatial resolution of the data. Although the digital form of the data removes the constraint imposed by the scale of a paper map, the detail and accuracy inherent in map scale are also present in the digital data. The fact that this database was compiled and edited at a scale of 1:100,000 means that higher resolution information may not have been uniformly retained in the dataset. Plotting at scales larger than 1:100,000 will not yield greater real detail, although it may reveal fine-scale irregularities below the intended resolution of the database. Similarly, although higher resolution data is incorporated in most of the map, the resolution of the combined output will be limited by the lower resolution data.
  1. Who distributes the data set? (Distributor 1 of 1)
    U.S. Geological Survey Information Services
    Box 25286 Denver Federal Center
    Denver, CO
    USA

    303-202-4700 (voice)
    303-202-4693 (FAX)
  2. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set? USGS Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-2354
  3. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?
    The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) provides these geographic data "as is. "The USGS makes no guarantee or warranty concerning the accuracy of information contained in the geographic data. The USGS further makes no warranties, either expressed or implied as to any other matter whatsoever, including, without limitation, the condition of the product, or its fitness for any particular purpose. The burden for determining fitness for use lies entirely with the user. Although these data have been processed successfully on computers at the USGS, no warranty, expressed or implied, is made by the USGS regarding the use of these data on any other system, nor does the fact of distribution constitute or imply any such warranty.
    In no event shall the USGS have any liability whatsoever for payment of any consequential, incidental, indirect, special, or tort damages of any kind, including, but not limited to, any loss of profits arising out of use of or reliance on the geographic data or arising out of the delivery, installation, operation, or support by USGS.
    This digital, geologic map database of the Chewelah 30' x 60' quadrangle, 1:100,000 map-scale, and any derivative maps thereof, is not meant to be used or displayed at any scale larger than 1:100,000 (e.g., 1:24,000).
  4. How can I download or order the data?
    • Availability in digital form:
      Data format: Geologic contacts, faults, unit labels, attitudes, dip values, lines of cross section, and base map information including topography, roads, and other cultural information in format ARCE (version 7.1.1) Size: 5.8
      Network links: http://pubs.usgs.gov/mf/2001/2354/chew.tar.gz
    • Cost to order the data: none


Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 10-Jun-2016
Last Reviewed: 31-Jan-2001
Metadata author:
Peter N Schweitzer
USGS Midwest Area
Collection manager, USGS Geoscience Data Clearinghouse, http://geo-nsdi.er.usgs.gov/
Mail Stop 954
12201 Sunrise Valley Dr
Reston, VA
USA

703-648-6533 (voice)
703-648-6252 (FAX)
pschweitzer@usgs.gov
Metadata standard:
Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (FGDC-STD-001-1998)
Metadata extensions used:

This page is <https://geo-nsdi.er.usgs.gov/metadata/map-mf/2354/metadata.faq.html>
Generated by mp version 2.9.48 on Tue Jul 03 20:05:05 2018